苗金丽, 郭宏. 2018: 铁路隧道衬砌欠厚返修施工应力分析. 工程地质学报, 26(s1): 280-288. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2018242
    引用本文: 苗金丽, 郭宏. 2018: 铁路隧道衬砌欠厚返修施工应力分析. 工程地质学报, 26(s1): 280-288. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2018242
    MIAO Jinli, GUO Hong. 2018: STRESS ANALYSIS OF INSUFFICIENT THICKNESS RAILWAY TUNNELING LINING DUE TO REPAIR CONSTRUCTURE. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 26(s1): 280-288. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2018242
    Citation: MIAO Jinli, GUO Hong. 2018: STRESS ANALYSIS OF INSUFFICIENT THICKNESS RAILWAY TUNNELING LINING DUE TO REPAIR CONSTRUCTURE. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 26(s1): 280-288. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2018242

    铁路隧道衬砌欠厚返修施工应力分析

    STRESS ANALYSIS OF INSUFFICIENT THICKNESS RAILWAY TUNNELING LINING DUE TO REPAIR CONSTRUCTURE

    • 摘要: 因施工过程中各种原因导致的铁路隧道二衬欠厚缺陷,考虑其作用,根据现行规范,当既有缺陷混凝土衬砌厚度小于设计厚度的70%以上时需要返修补强处理。为保证衬砌返修施工过程中结构稳定,施工安全,需确定一次性返修凿除衬砌的范围,除施工中通常采用的工程类比确定凿除面积的方法外,可通过数值及解析计算方法确定。通过对隧道自稳定性较差的非层状Ⅳ级及Ⅴ级围岩衬砌进行解析计算,并采用GTS岩土有限元2D模型进行数值模拟,获得了衬砌结构在拱顶凿除不同范围工况下其受力特征及结构安全系数。分析及计算结果表明衬砌结构在拱顶开窗处、侧墙及底脚是应力较大部位,且拱顶衬砌产生拉应力作用区。对于Ⅳ级围岩,在不考虑钢筋作用条件下,拱顶开窗面积2 m2时,衬砌结构稳定;对于Ⅴ级围岩,考虑衬砌配筋条件下在拱顶一次性凿除面积2m2时,衬砌结构也是安全的。

       

      Abstract: Railway tunnel secondary lining insufficient thickness caused by varies factors during construction need reinforce according to current relate regulations when the in-fact thickness less than 70%compare to the design value. We need to define the one time remove area of secondary tunnel lining to ensure the safety construction, and not affect the stability of existing structure. Right and reasonable implementation plan can be determined by calculation, analysis and engineering analogy, et al. For tunnel lining on the poor self-stability Ⅳ and Ⅴ grade surrounding no-layer rock-mass, using analytic calculation and numerical simulation method with 2D GTS(geotechnical and tunnel finite element analytic software),we can obtain the stress characteristics and structure safety factor of tunnel lining under the condition of different removed range on the vault of tunnel lining. The analysis and calculation results imply that the tunnel lining stress is relative large in the vault, side wall and bottom corner and tensile stress appears in the vault zone. The tunnel lining structure is safety when the cut open-window construction of the tunneling vault within 2m2 area for the Ⅳ grade surrounding rock-mass need not consider the reinforcing steel bar effect, but for the V grade surrounding rock-mass, must consider the reinforcing steel bar role.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回