高温高压耦合作用下超深层碳酸盐岩力学响应机制试验研究

    EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE RESPONSE MECHANISMS OF CARBONATE MECHANICS IN ULTRA-DEEP LAYERS UNDER COUPLED HIGH TEMPERATURE AND HIGH PRESSURE EFFECTS

    • 摘要: 为探究超深层高温高压耦合环境下不同类型碳酸盐岩的力学行为与破裂特征,为超深层油气资源安全高效开发提供力学依据,本研究以四川盆地震旦系灯影组白云岩、顺北奥陶系一间房组灰岩及顺北寒武系下丘里塔格组白云岩为研究对象,采用自主研制的高温高压三轴岩石力学试验系统,在150 ℃与0~230 MPa围压耦合条件下开展三轴压缩变形试验,并结合高能加速器CT扫描与三维重建技术,分析岩石应力-应变特征、力学参数演化规律、脆-延转换特性及破裂模式。结果表明:随围压增大,碳酸盐岩塑性逐渐增强,从脆性应力突降向应变强化转换,且3套地层转换阈值存在显著差异。灯影组白云岩在220 MPa围压下仍具脆性,达到峰值强度时出现应力突降,一间房组灰岩与下丘里塔格组白云岩则分别在60 MPa和30 MPa围压时发生脆-延转换;峰值强度与峰值应变均随围压升高而增大,灯影组白云岩峰值强度显著高于其他两套地层,且对围压敏感性更强,峰值应变则最低;弹性模量和泊松比随围压变化呈阶段性特征,弹性模量先增后趋于稳定,泊松比先增后减并趋于稳定,其中灯影组白云岩变化幅度最大,下丘理塔格组白云岩最小;破坏特征上,低围压(尤其是单轴条件)下岩石以张拉破裂为主,裂缝复杂且连通性好,随围压增大,裂缝复杂程度降低,逐渐向剪切破坏或塑性流动转变,甚至出现应变强化,破坏模式仅表现为内部局部损伤。破坏模式的转变受岩性、天然结构及矿物组成影响。研究揭示了3套碳酸盐岩在高温高压耦合作用下的力学响应的差异,为超深层能源开发中的储层改造与井壁稳定性评估提供了关键力学依据。

       

      Abstract: To investigate the mechanical behavior and fracture characteristics of different types of carbonate rocks under ultra-deep high-temperature and high-pressure (HTHP) coupling conditions, and to provide a mechanical basis for the safe and efficient development of ultra-deep oil and gas resources, this study focuses on three carbonate formations: the Sinian Dengying Formation dolomite in the Sichuan Basin, the Ordovician Yijianfang Formation limestone in Shunbei, and the Cambrian Lower Qiulitage Formation dolomite in Shunbei. Using a self-developed HTHP triaxial rock mechanics testing system, triaxial compression tests were performed under coupled conditions of 150 ℃ and confining pressures ranging from 0 to 230 MPa. Combined with high-energy accelerator CT scanning and three-dimensional reconstruction techniques, the stress-strain characteristics, evolution of mechanical parameters, brittle-ductile transition behavior, and failure modes of the rocks were systematically analyzed. The results indicate that as confining pressure increases, the plasticity of carbonate rocks gradually increases, transitioning from brittle stress drop to strain hardening, with significant differences in transition thresholds among the three formations. The Dengying Formation dolomite remains brittle even at a confining pressure of 220 MPa, exhibiting a distinct stress drop upon reaching peak strength. In contrast, the Yijianfang Formation limestone and Xiaqiulitage Formation dolomite undergo brittle-ductile transition at confining pressures of 60 MPa and 30 MPa, respectively. Both peak strength and peak strain increase with rising confining pressure. The Dengying Formation dolomite exhibits significantly higher peak strength than the other two formations, showing greater sensitivity to confining pressure while having the lowest peak strain. The elastic modulus and Poisson′s ratio exhibit stage-dependent variations with increasing confining pressure: the elastic modulus initially increases rapidly and then stabilizes, while Poisson′s ratio first increases, then decreases, and eventually stabilizes. Among the three rock types, the Dengying Formation dolomite shows the most pronounced variations, whereas the Lower Qiulitage Formation dolomite exhibits the least. Regarding failure characteristics, under low confining pressure (especially uniaxial conditions), tensile fractures dominate, with complex and well-connected crack networks. As confining pressure increases, fracture complexity decreases, and the failure mode gradually transitions to shear failure or plastic flow; under sufficiently high confining pressures, strain hardening occurs, with failure manifesting only as localized internal damage. The transition in failure modes is influenced by lithology, natural structure, and mineral composition. This study reveals the distinct mechanical responses of three carbonate rock types under HTHP coupling conditions, providing key mechanical insights for reservoir stimulation and wellbore stability assessment in ultra-deep energy development.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回