证据权法在区域滑坡危险性评价中的应用以贵州省为例

范强; 巨能攀; 向喜琼; 黄健

doi:10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2014.03.017

证据权法在区域滑坡危险性评价中的应用以贵州省为例

doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2014.03.017

1.
地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室成都理工大学成都 610059;
2.
贵州大学喀斯特环境与地质灾害防治教育部重点实验室贵阳 550003

基金项目:

贵州省国土资源厅科技项目（黔国土资源函[2010]39号）资助

详细信息

作者简介:
范强，男，博士研究生，主要从事地质灾害评价、监测预警等研究.Email：fanq@cdut.edu.cn

中图分类号: P642.22
计量
- 文章访问数: 3446
- HTML全文浏览量: 182
- PDF下载量: 870
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-03-04
- 修回日期: 2014-05-12
- 刊出日期: 2014-06-25

LANDSLIDES HAZARDS ASSESSMENT WITH WEIGHTS OF CASE STUDY IN GUIZHOU, CHINA

1.
State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059;
2.
Key Laboratory of Karst Environment and Geohazard Prevention, Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550003

摘要

摘要: 以GIS为技术平台，采用证据权法对研究区进行了滑坡地质灾害危险性分析。综合分析历史滑坡数据及其环境因素和触发因素，数据源主要有地形图、DEM、地质图，选取地层岩性、构造、高程、坡度、坡向、地形起伏度、道路、水系作为危险性评价因子。首先应用ArcGIS软件对数据源进行处理，提取各个评价因子图层，并对每个图层进行分级、缓冲区分析等处理，建立若干证据层。然后将历史灾害点与评价因子进行空间关联分析，计算每个评价因子等级的权重，最后计算出评价单元的危险性指数，并将危险性分为极高危险区、高危险区、中等危险区、低危险区。采用成功率曲线法对证据权法评价精度进行验证，结果表明本次评价的精度为71%。利用历史滑坡数据对评价结果进行验证，结果显示评价结果与实际情况较为吻合，说明证据权可以客观定量地评价各影响因子对滑坡的影响程度，该方法应用于区域地质灾害危险性评价比较有效。
- GIS /
- 滑坡 /
- 危险性评价 /
- 证据权法
Abstract: Landslides are the most common geohazards in mountainous terrains and can cause extraordinary landscape changes and destruction of people's lives and properties. So assessing landslide hazards is significant and can provide valuable information to planners,developers and engineers. This paper examines some landslides at a hilly area of western China,Guizhou province. The purpose is to generate a landslide susceptibility map using the weights of evidence. It is based on the GIS technology and combined with landslides inventory and environmental factors. The causal factors include lithology,tectonic,elevation,slope,aspect,relief,distance from road and distance from stream. The weight of each causal class is calculated in a GIS software ArcGIS 10. Then the landslide hazard index of each unit is produced and divided into four classes: very high hazard,high hazard,medium hazard and low hazard. Finally,a success rate curve is built to detect the capability rate of the method. The study area under the curve is 0.71.A hazard zonation map is produced and the predictive power of the map is tested on the basis of landslides inventory. The evaluation results are in line with the landslides distribution. The weights of evidence are effective to assess the landslides hazard in regional scale.
- GIS /
- Landslides /
- Hazards assessment /
- Weights of evidence

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

[1] Regmi N R,Giardino J R,Vitek J D.Assessing susceptibility to landslides: Using models to understand observed changes in slopes[J].Geomorphology, 2010, 122 (1—2): 25~38.

[2] 乔建平, 石莉莉.滑坡危险度区划方法及其应用[J].地质通报, 2009, 28 (8): 1031~1038.Qiao Jianping, Shi Lili.Landslide fatalness zoning method and its application.Geological Bulletin of China, 2009, 28 (8): 1031~1038.

[3] 殷坤龙, 朱良峰.滑坡灾害空间区划及GIS应用研究[J].地学前缘, 2001, 8 (2): 279~284.Yin Kunlong, Zhu Liangfeng.Landslide hazard zonation and application of GIS.Earth Science Frontiers, 2001, 8 (2): 279~284.

[4] 谢洪斌, 杨雪,谭德军,等.模糊证据权法在地震滑坡危险度区划中的应用[J].中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21 (8): 164~170.Xie Hongbin, Yang Xue, Tan Dejun, et al.Application of fuzzy weight of evidence method in seismic landslide zonation.China Safety Science Journal, 2011, 21 (8): 164~170.

[5] 张艳玲, 南征兵,周平根.利用证据权法实现滑坡易发性区划[J].水文地质工程地质, 2012, 39 (2): 121~125.Zhang Yanling, Nan Zhengbing, Zhou Pinggen.Division of landslide susceptibility based on weights of evidence model.Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2012, 39 (2): 121~125.

[6] 黄润秋, 向喜琼,巨能攀.我国区域地质灾害评价的现状及问题[J].地质通报, 2004, 23 (11): 1078~1082.Huang Runqiu, Xiang Xiqiong, Ju Nengpan.Assessment of China's regional geohazards: present situation and problems.Geological bulletin of China, 2004, 23 (11): 1078~1082.

[7] 王志旺, 李端有,王湘桂.证据权法在滑坡危险度区划研究中的应用[J].岩土工程学报, 2007, 29 (8): 1268~1273.Wang Zhiwang, Li Duanyou, Wang Xianggui.Zonation of landslide hazards based on weights of evidence model.Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29 (8): 1268~1273.

[8] Dahal R K,Hasegawa S,Nonomura A,et al.GIS-based weights- of -evidence modelling of rainfall-induced landslides in small catchments for landslide susceptibility mapping[J].Environmental Geology, 2008, 54 (2): 311~324.

[9] 邓清禄, 王学平.长江三峡库区滑坡与构造活动的关系[J].工程地质学报, 2000, 8 (2): 136~141.Deng Qinglu, Wang Xueping.Relationship between neotectonism and landslides in reservoir area of Three-Gorges project on Yangtze river.Journal of Engineering Geology, 2000, 8 (2): 136~141.

[10] 郭芳芳, 杨农,孟晖,等.地形起伏度和坡度分析在区域滑坡灾害评价中的应用[J].中国地质, 2008, 35 (1): 131~143.Guo Fangfang, Yang Nong, Meng Hui, et al.Application of the relief amplitude and slope analysis to regional landslide hazard assessment.Geology in China, 2008, 35 (1): 131~143.

[11] Westen C J V,Rengers N,Soeters R.Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment[J].Natural Hazards, 2003, 30 (3): 399~419.

[12] Poli S,Sterlacchini S.Landslide representation strategies in susceptibility studies using weights-of-evidence modeling technique [J].Natural Resources Research, 2007, 16 (2): 121~134.

[13] 许冲.实际滑坡是滑坡危险性评价结果合理性检验最好的标准[J].工程地质学报, 2013, 21 (6): 908~911.Xu Chong.Actual landslides as most objective standard for validation of landslide hazard assessment result.Journal of Engineering Geology, 2013, 21 (6): 908~911.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计