宋玉鹏, 宋丙辉, 孙永福, 等. 2021. 海洋静力触探在海上平台桩基承载力计算中的应用[J].工程地质学报, 29(6): 1942-1948. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-O004.
    引用本文: 宋玉鹏, 宋丙辉, 孙永福, 等. 2021. 海洋静力触探在海上平台桩基承载力计算中的应用[J].工程地质学报, 29(6): 1942-1948. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-O004.
    Song Yupeng, Song Binghui, Sun Yonghu, et al. 2021. Application of seabed cone penetration test in calculation of bearing capacity of pile foundlaion ofoffshore platform[J]. Jourmal of Engineering Geology, 29(6): 1942-1948. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0004.
    Citation: Song Yupeng, Song Binghui, Sun Yonghu, et al. 2021. Application of seabed cone penetration test in calculation of bearing capacity of pile foundlaion ofoffshore platform[J]. Jourmal of Engineering Geology, 29(6): 1942-1948. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0004.

    海洋静力触探在海上平台桩基承载力计算中的应用

    APPLICATION OF SEABED CONE PENETRATION TEST IN CALCULATION OF BEARING CAPACITY OF PILE FOUNDATION OF OFFSHORE PLAT ̄FORM

    • 摘要: 静力触探探测具有原位性、连续性、高效性以及高分辨率的优点,利用海洋静力触探探测成果计算海上平台桩基承载力具有非常大的应用空间。以胜利油田埕岛海域某平台为例,使用ROSON100型海洋静力触探仪对平台各桩腿开展原位探测,同步进行钻探取样及室内土工参数测试。分别利用静力触探和钻探取样测试成果计算了平台桩基承载力,对比讨论了3种桩基承载力计算方法之间的异同。结果表明:3种方法对应的桩侧摩阻力随埋深变化整体趋势基本一致;基于一定区域工程经验,钻探规范法和静探间接法得到的桩端阻力、单桩极限承载力基本吻合,而静探直接法得到的桩端阻力和单桩极限承载力相较前两者明显偏大;考虑以粉砂作为持力层的前提下3种桩基极限承载力计算方法表现出较好的兼容性。研究成果可为海洋工程桩基承载力计算提供新的借鉴,具有一定科学意义和应用价值。

       

      Abstract: Cone penetration detection has the advantages of in-situ, continuity, high efficiency and resolution. The use of marine cone penetration detection results to estimate the bearing capacity of offshore platform pile foundation has a great application potential. This paper takes the pile foundation of a platform in the Chengdao sea area of Shengli Oilfield as an example. The ROSON100 marine cone penetration device was used to conduct in-situ detection around the platform's legs. Simultaneous drilling sampling and indoor geotechnical parameters testing were implemented. The results of cone penetration detection and geotechnical tests were used to estimate the bearing capacity of platform pile foundation, respectively. The similarities and differences between three different calculation methods of bearing capacity of pile foundation were discussed. The results show that the overall trend of the pile side friction resistance obtained by these three methods is basically the same with the buried depth. Based on certain regional engineering experience, the pile tip resistance and single pile ultimate bearing capacity obtained by the drilling specification method and the CPT indirect method are basically consistent. The pile tip resistance and the ultimate bearing capacity of single pile obtained by the CPT direct method are obviously larger than the former two. The ultimate bearing capacity of pile foundation shows good compatibility for these three calculation methods under the premise of considering silty sand as the bearing layer. The findings can provide a new reference for the calculation of the bearing capacity of offshore engineering pile foundation.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回