作者中心
专家审稿
编委审稿
主编审稿
RESEARCH ON INFLUENCING FACTORS OF RED SANDSTONE DIS-INTEGRATION DURING DRYING-WETTING CYCLES
-
摘要: 红砂岩广泛分布于我国南方地区，因强度低、胶结程度差，且含有一定的膨胀性黏土矿物，此类岩石受水影响易发生崩解，从而易诱发多种地质灾害。选取湖南株洲地区的微膨胀红砂岩进行静态与扰动崩解试验，采用耐崩解性指数、标准基础熵、崩解比和分形维数等作为评价红砂岩崩解特性指标，探讨了烘干温度、试块质量、外界扰动和干湿循环作用等因素对红砂岩崩解特性的影响。研究结果表明，静态崩解方式下，相比于105 ℃和30 ℃，60 ℃的烘干温度更利于岩样崩解。而扰动崩解下，烘干温度对红砂岩崩解的影响几乎可以忽略不计。在烘干温度、试块质量等因素不变的情况下，外界扰动对红砂岩崩解特性存在显著影响。试块质量对红砂岩崩解特性存在一定的影响，试块质量越大，红砂岩崩解速率越快。干湿循环作用对红砂岩崩解的影响十分显著，随着循环次数增加，红砂岩的崩解破碎程度逐渐加大。Abstract: Red sandstone is widely distributed in southern China. Due to the low strength,poor cementation and swelling clay minerals,red sandstone is prone to disintegrate under the influence of water,which can easily induce a variety of geological disasters. The static and disturbed disintegration tests are conducted on the slightly swelling red sandstone collected form Zhuzhou area of Hunan Province. The effects of dry temperature,external disturbance,test block mass and drying-wetting cycle on the disintegration characteristic are explored using evaluating indexes,including slake durability index,standard basis entropy,disintegration ratio and fractal dimension. The results show that,under the static disintegration mode,the drying temperature of 60 ℃is more favorable to disintegrate for red sandstone than those of 105 ℃ and 30 ℃. However,under the disturbed disintegration mode,the effect of drying temperature on the disintegration of red sandstone is almost negligible. Furthermore,in the case of constant temperature and test block mass,the external disturbance has a significant effect on the disintegration properties of red sandstone. Then,the test block mass has the influence on the disintegration behaviors of red sandstone.The faster disintegration rate occurs with the larger test block mass. In addition,the influence of drying-wetting cycle on the disintegration of red sandstone is very significant. The disintegration breakage of red sandstone gradually increases with the increasing cycle numbers.
-
Key words:
- Disintegration /
- Red sandstone /
- Dry-wet cycle /
- Slightly swelling /
- Slaking durability index test
-
图 10 静态与扰动崩解的IdN-N对比图
Figure 10. Comparison of IdN-N in static and disturbed disintegration
图 11 静态与扰动崩解的D-N对比
Figure 11. Comparison of D-N in static and disturbed disintegration
图 12 静态与扰动崩解的Sb-N对比
Figure 12. Comparison of Sb-N in static and disturbed disintegration
图 13 静态与扰动崩解的IRdN-N对比图
Figure 13. Comparison of IRdN-N in static and disturbed disintegration
表 1 红砂岩矿物成分
Table 1. Mineral composition of red sandstone
矿物名称 百分含量/% 矿物名称 百分含量/% 石英 40.85 绿泥石 5.24 方解石 20.47 伊利石 2.52 长石 12.84 绿脱石 1.16 云母 8.41 蒙脱石 0.81 高岭石 6.96 其他 0.74 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 各试样的试验设计参数
Table 2. Test design parameters of each sample
崩解方法 烘干温度/℃ 试块质量范围/g 平均质量/g 循环次数N/次 试样编号 静态浸水崩解 105 40~60 51.14 1~20 TW01 60 40~60 51.87 1~20 TW02 30 40~60 51.08 1~20 TW03 外界扰动崩解 105 40~60 53.32 1~20 TY01 60 40~60 47.76 1~20 TY02 30 40~60 51.09 1~20 TY03 静态浸水崩解 105 24~38 33.27 1~20 TZ01 105 62~83 70.30 1~20 TZ02 105 146~153 150.29 1~20 TZ03 105 297~327 311.98 1~20 TZ04 105 467~478 472.59 1~20 TZ05 105 589~633 611.00 1~20 TZ06
下载: 导出CSV
-
Cheng X G, He Z Y, Liu M N, et al. 2020. Study on engineering geological characteristics and unfavorable geology subarea of Huaibei Paleogene red-bed[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2020-12-30, https://doi.org/10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2020-273 .Deng T, Huang M, Zhan J W. 2014. Fractal evolution law of clay rock disintegration under different pH conditions[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 42 (10): 1480-1485. Erguler Z A, Shakoor A. 2009. Relative contribution of various climatic processes in disintegration of clay-bearing rocks[J]. Engineering Geology, 108(1-2): 36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.06.002 Fu H Y, Liu J, Zeng L, et al. 2019. Disintegration characteristics of carbonaceous mudstone under loading and wet-dry cycles[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transort, 32 (9): 22-31. Gamble J. 1971. Durability-plasticity classification of shales and other argillaceous rock[D]. Urbana: University of Illinois. LÖrincz J. 1986. Grading entropy of soils[D]. Budapest: University of Budapest. Liang B, Cao Q, Wang J G, et al. 2017. Experimental study on slaking characteristics of feeble disintegration soft rock in drying-wetting cycle[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 27 (8): 91-96. Liu X M, Yan S, Liu K, et al. 2020. Experimental study on strength properties of red bed weak rock filler under dry-wet cycles[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 37 (3): 24-30. Phienwej N. 1987. Ground response and support performance in a sheared shale, Stillwater Tunnel[D]. Urbana: University of Illinois. The Professional Standards Compilation Group of the People's Republic of China. 2015. Regulation for testing the physical and mechanical properties of rock(DZ/T 0276-2015)[S]. Beijing: Ministry of Nature Resources of the People's Republic of China. Xie X S, Chen H S, Xiao X H, et al. 2019. Micro-structural characteristics and softening mechanism of red-bed soft rock under water-rock interaction condition[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 27 (5): 966-972. Yan L B, Liu P, Peng H, et al. 2019. Laboratory study of the effect of temperature difference on the disintegration of red bed soft rock[J]. Physical Geography, 40 (2): 149-163. doi: 10.1080/02723646.2018.1559418 Zeng L, Luo J T, Hou P, et al. 2019. Crack development and strength characteristics of pre-disintegrated carbonaceous mudstone under wet-dry cycles[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 32 (9): 22-31. Zeng Z X, Kong L W, Tian H, et al. 2017. Effect of drying and wetting cycles on disintegration behavior of swelling mudstone and its grading entropy characterization[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 38 (7): 1983-1989. Zhou C Y, Liang N, Liu Z. 2020. Multifractal characteristics of pore structure of red beds soft rock at different saturations[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 28 (1): 1-9. Zhao T, Wang L, Su H M, et al. 2021. Nonlinear viscoelastic damage constitutive of red sandstone under impact load[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 29 (2): 545-553. Zhao X Y, Li K P, Xiao D. 2020. Slaking characteristics of silty mudstone under acid rain action based on fractal dimension[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 28 (2): 232-239. Zhang J R, Hu Y, Zhang B W, et al. 2015. Fractal behavior of particle-size distribution during particle crushing of quartz sand and gravel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 37 (5): 784-791. Zhang S, Xu Q, Hu Z M. 2016. Effects of rainwater softening on red mudstone of deep-seated landslide, Southwest China[J]. Engineering Geology, 204 : 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.01.013 Zhang Z T. 2018. Experimental study on disintegration characteristic of swelling rock subjected to the dry and wet cycle[D]. Xiangtan: Hunan University of Science and Technology. Zhang Z T, Gao W H, Zhang Z M, et al. 2019a. Disintegration characteristics and fractal features of swelling rock during dry-wet cycles[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 16 (4): 930-937. Zhang Z T, Gao W H, Tang X Y, et al. 2019b. Characteristics of grading entropy of disintegration of swelling rock under dry-wet cycles[J]. Journal of Water Resources & Water Engineering, 30 (6): 218-224. Zhang Z T, Gao W H, Zhang Z M, et al. 2020. Evolution of particle disintegration of red sandstone using Weibull distribution[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 41 (3): 877-885. Zhang Z T, Gao W H. 2020. Effect of different test methods on the disintegration behaviour of soft rock and the evolution model of disintegration breakage under cyclic wetting and drying[J]. Engineering Geology, 279. 程香港, 何昭宇, 刘梦楠, 等. 2020. 淮北古近系"红层"工程地质特性及不良地质分区研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2020-12-30, https://doi.org/10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2020-273 .邓涛, 黄明, 詹金武. 2014. 不同pH环境下黏土类岩崩解过程分形演化规律[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 42 (10): 1480-1485. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ201410003.htm 付宏渊, 刘杰, 曾铃, 等. 2019. 考虑荷载及干湿循环作用的炭质泥岩崩解特征试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 32 (9): 22-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL201909003.htm 梁冰, 曹强, 王俊光, 等. 2017. 弱崩解性软岩干-湿循环条件下崩解特性试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 27 (8): 91-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZAQK201708016.htm 刘晓明, 颜圣, 刘凯, 等. 2020. 干湿循环作用下红层软岩填料强度特性试验研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 37 (3): 24-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK202003004.htm 谢小帅, 陈华松, 肖欣宏, 等. 2019. 水岩耦合下的红层软岩微观结构特征与软化机制研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 27 (5): 966-972. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2019028 曾铃, 罗锦涛, 侯鹏, 等. 2020. 干湿循环作用下预崩解炭质泥岩裂隙发育规律及强度特性[J]. 中国公路学报, 33 (9): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL202009002.htm 曾志雄, 孔令伟, 田海, 等. 2017. 膨胀岩崩解特性的干湿循环效应与粒度熵表征[J]. 岩土力学, 38 (7): 1983-1989. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201707018.htm 周翠英, 梁宁, 刘镇. 2020. 红层软岩遇水作用的孔隙结构多重分形特征[J]. 工程地质学报, 28 (1): 1-9. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2018-337 赵涛, 王磊, 苏宏明, 等. 2021. 冲击荷载下红砂岩非线性黏弹性损伤本构研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 29 (2): 545-553. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2020-182 赵晓彦, 李昆鹏, 肖典, 等. 2020. 基于分形理论的粉砂质泥岩酸雨崩解特征研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 28 (2): 232-239. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2019-368 张季如, 胡泳, 张弼文, 等. 2015. 石英砂砾破碎过程中粒径分布的分形行为研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 37 (5): 784-791. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201505004.htm 张宗堂. 2018. 干湿循环作用下膨胀岩的崩解特性试验研究[D]. 湘潭: 湖南科技大学. 张宗堂, 高文华, 张志敏, 等. 2019a. 干湿循环作用下膨胀岩的崩解特性及分形特征[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 16 (4): 930-937. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSTD201904013.htm 张宗堂, 高文华, 唐骁宇, 等. 2019b. 干湿循环作用下膨胀岩崩解的粒度熵特征[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 30 (6): 218-224. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBSZ201906033.htm 张宗堂, 高文华, 张志敏, 等. 2020. 基于Weibull分布的红砂岩颗粒崩解破碎演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 41 (3): 877-885. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX202003018.htm 中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. 2015. 岩石物理力学性质试验规程(DZ/T 0276-2015)[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国国土资源部. -
点击查看大图
图(17) / 表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 71
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 25
- 被引次数: 0
