侏罗系弱胶结顶板采动破坏规律与发育高度预测

徐智敏 韩宇航 陈天赐 陈歌 郇博程 赵瑞强 孙亚军

徐智敏, 韩宇航, 陈天赐, 等. 2023. 侏罗系弱胶结顶板采动破坏规律与发育高度预测[J]. 工程地质学报, 31(4): 1474-1485. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2023-0239
引用本文: 徐智敏, 韩宇航, 陈天赐, 等. 2023. 侏罗系弱胶结顶板采动破坏规律与发育高度预测[J]. 工程地质学报, 31(4): 1474-1485. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2023-0239
Xu Zhimin, Han Yuhang, Chen Tianci, et al. 2023. Mining-induced overburden failure and height prediction in Jurassic weakly cemented roof[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 31(4): 1474-1485. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2023-0239
Citation: Xu Zhimin, Han Yuhang, Chen Tianci, et al. 2023. Mining-induced overburden failure and height prediction in Jurassic weakly cemented roof[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 31(4): 1474-1485. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2023-0239

侏罗系弱胶结顶板采动破坏规律与发育高度预测

doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2023-0239
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金重点项目 42130706

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    徐智敏(1981-),男,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事矿井水文地质工程地质方面的科研与教学工作. E-mail:xuzhimin@cumt.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: TD32

MINING-INDUCED OVERBURDEN FAILURE AND HEIGHT PREDICTION IN JURASSIC WEAKLY CEMENTED ROOF

Funds: 

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 42130706

  • 摘要: 煤层采动后形成的顶板导水裂隙带是沟通顶板充水含水层的主要通道之一,同时也是顶板水害防治需要重点研究的关键问题。近年来,西部矿区已成为我国煤炭资源主要开采区,其主采侏罗系含煤地层与东部石炭-二叠系有着明显差异,并具有典型的孔隙度高、胶结程度差等特征,顶板采动导水裂隙的演化特征也与东部矿区具有较大差异,相关的研究尚未形成普适性成果。因此,本文选取典型的弱胶结地区——新疆哈密大南湖矿区为例,采用UDEC数值模拟、现场三维钻孔电视成像等方法,并结合“S-R”稳定理论,以垮落带高度为自变量,建立砌体梁承载强度与垮落带高度关系式,全面揭示该区煤层开采过程中顶板的采动破坏过程与演化特征,并以此为依据确定顶板导水裂隙带的发育高度。在此基础上,通过收集侏罗系同类型煤矿导水裂隙带高度的实测数据,采用回归分析方法,拟合并修正现有经验公式。研究表明:研究区顶板导水裂隙带发育高度的范围是60.07~62 m,裂采比为17.67~18.24,整体形态呈“梯台”型特征,结合邻矿现场实测对比证实了此次实测结果的可靠性;开采范围内导水裂隙带发育高度受垮落带高度增量、岩块回转角变化的影响呈现:“快速增加-缓慢增加-逐渐稳定”的发展与演化规律;验证计算结果表明,论文提出的回归公式预测精度一般在10.30% ~17.25%之间,相较于传统经验公式平均误差降低了51.84%,显著提高了导水裂隙带高度的预测精度。论文的相关研究成果可为新疆地区相似开采条件下顶板导水裂隙带发育高度计算提供理论依据。
  • 图  1  研究区地形地貌图

    Figure  1.  Topographic and geomorphological map of the research area

    图  2  18煤顶板水文地质结构示意图

    Figure  2.  Sectional structure of No.18 coal seam

    图  3  数值计算模型

    Figure  3.  Numerical calculation model

    图  4  导水裂隙发育示意图

    Figure  4.  The development of water-conducting fractured zone

    图  5  工作面覆岩破坏云图

    a. 采动40 m覆岩下沉云图;b. 采动40 m覆岩裂隙云图;c. 采动120 m覆岩下沉云图;d. 采动120 m覆岩裂隙云图;e. 采动160 m覆岩下沉云图;f. 采动160 m覆岩裂隙云图

    Figure  5.  Overburden destruction cloud map

    图  6  钻孔结构图

    Figure  6.  Borehole structure drawing

    图  7  孔内裂隙发育情况图

    Figure  7.  Fissure development in borehole

    图  8  工作面覆岩裂隙发育示意图

    Figure  8.  Illustration of overburden fracture development

    图  9  “砌体梁”形态变化示意图

    Figure  9.  Schematic of the morphological change of the "masonry beam"

    图  10  垮落带高度影响示意图

    Figure  10.  The influence of the height of caving zone on bearing capacity of masonry beams

    表  1  工作面数值模型工程地质类型及物理力学参数

    Table  1.   Engineering geological types and their physico-mechanical parameters in the numerical model of the panel

    序号 岩性 密度/kg·m-3 体积模量/GPa 剪切模量/GPa 抗拉强度/MPa 黏聚力/MPa 内摩擦角/(°) 法向刚度/GPa 切向刚度/GPa
    1 18煤 1300 3.71 1.91 1.1 1.0 24 0.01 0.01
    2 粉砂岩 2400 28.33 18.20 9.0 9.6 32 0.40 0.40
    3 粗粒砂岩 2400 26.00 17.03 5.6 6.0 30 0.05 0.05
    4 粉砂岩 2400 28.33 18.20 9.0 9.6 32 0.40 0.40
    5 泥岩 2430 4.00 2.10 2.2 1.7 28 0.04 0.04
    6 中砾岩 2400 12.45 7.11 4.2 2.5 36 0.09 0.09
    7 泥岩 2430 4.00 2.10 2.2 1.7 28 0.04 0.04
    8 粉砂岩 2400 28.33 18.20 9.0 9.6 32 0.40 0.40
    9 中砾岩 2400 12.45 7.11 4.2 2.5 36 0.09 0.09
    10 细砂岩 2400 13.05 9.00 3.8 3.6 32 0.08 0.08
    11 中砾岩 2400 12.45 7.11 4.2 2.5 36 0.09 0.09
    12 泥岩 2430 4.00 2.10 2.2 1.7 28 0.04 0.04
    13 覆岩 2400 28.33 18.20 9.0 9.6 32 0.40 0.40
    14 底板 2400 28.33 18.20 9.0 9.6 32 0.40 0.40
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  cg-1钻孔数据

    Table  2.   Cg-1 borehole datasheet

    cg-1孔标高/m cg-1孔底标高/m 煤层顶板标高/m cg-1孔深/m
    +480.408 +235.51 +232.407 +244.898
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  实测结果的对比分析

    Table  3.   Contrast with real test results

    参数 沙吉海矿 国神一矿 1801工作面
    采厚/m 6 6.3 3.0
    裂隙高度/m 78.52~81.54 94~98 46~47
    裂采比 13.09~13.59 14.92~15.56 15.33~15.67
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  软弱覆岩导高计算公式

    Table  4.   Calculation formula of the height of water-conducting fractured zone in weak overburden

    岩性 计算公式之一/m 计算公式之二/m
    软弱 $H_{\mathrm{L}}=\frac{100 \sum M}{3.1 \sum M+5.0} \pm 4.0$ $H_{\mathrm{L}}=10 \sqrt{\sum M}+5$
    M为累计采厚(m);HL为导水裂隙带高度(m)
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  导水裂隙带计算高度

    Table  5.   Calculated height of water-conducting fracture zone

    预测方法 “三下”规范 数值模拟 三维钻孔成像
    计算高度 公式一
    25.88
    公式二
    23.44
    62 60.07
    最大裂采比 7.61 6.89 18.24 17.67
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  矿井导水裂隙带高度实测数据统计

    Table  6.   Statistics of height measurements water-conducting fractured zone in different mines

    序号 煤矿 煤层采厚/m 实测高度/m
    1 榆树岭矿 8.6 86.0
    2 榆树泉矿 6.9 70.1
    3 塔什店二井田矿 9.6 129.3
    4 伊犁四矿 7.1 74.2
    5 陈家沟煤矿 10.6 124.0
    6 下沟矿 8.7 97.5
    7 崔木煤矿 8.2 90.5
    8 红柳煤矿 5.3 62.5
    9 上湾煤矿 5.8 63.0
    10 鄂尔多斯东胜矿 6.0 63.4
    11 布尔台煤矿 3.0 36.8
    12 寸草塔二矿 2.8 31.1
    13 乌兰木伦煤矿 2.5 43.2
    14 上湾煤矿 3.4 46.0
    15 补连塔煤矿 4.4 64.2
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  7  导水裂隙带高度对比

    Table  7.   Comparison of the height of water-conducting fractured zones

    煤矿 煤层采厚/m 实测高度/m 经验公式计算高度 与实际值误差/% 回归公式计算高度/m 与实际值误差/%
    察哈素煤矿 4.75 67.10 24.08 64.11 59.41 11.46
    大南湖五号井 3.00 47.59 20.98 55.92 40.54 14.81
    活鸡兔煤矿 3.70 54.00 22.47 58.41 48.44 10.30
    红庆河煤矿 6.00 86.10 25.42 70.48 71.25 17.25
    多伦协鑫煤矿 9.58 112.00 27.61 75.35 99.40 11.25
    下载: 导出CSV
  • Chen L W, Wang Y X, Ou Q H, et al. 2021. Prediction model for development height of water-conducting fractured zone during mining near loose stratum considering influence of overburden structure: A case study of Huaibei coalfield[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 29 (4): 1048-1056.
    Ding J, Dong D L, Hu Z Q, et al. 2021. Resistance to permeability damage and pillar safety of coal mining under giant thick loose seam—Take Kouzidong mine as an example[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 29 (4): 1071-1083.
    Dong S L, Ji Y D, Wang H, et al. 2020. Prevention and control technology and application of roof water disaster in Jurassic coal field of Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 45 (7): 2367-2375.
    Fang Z L, Liu Z G. 2020. Mud cover effect of mining-induced failure of soft overburden in thick clay strata[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 37 (6): 1196-1204.
    Hou W. 2020. Research on water filling evaluation and water disaster prevention technology of 5-2 coal seam in HongLiulin mine[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Science and Technology.
    Hou D. 2021. Research on green mining efficiency and guarantee mechanis of coal resources in China[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology(Beijing).
    Liu T Q. 1981. Law of surface movement and overburden failure in coal mine and its application[M]. Beijing: China Coal Industry Publishing House.
    Lin Q, Qiao W. 2016. Water prevention and control technology of roof bed separation in Cuimu Mine[J]. Coal Sicience and Technology, 44 (3): 129-134.
    Lai X P, Cui F, Cao J T, et al. 2017. Analysis on characteristics of overlying rock caving and fissure conductive water in top-coal caving working face at three soft coal seam[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 42 (1): 148-154.
    Li C F, Liu Y F, Li K K. 2018. Equipment improvement and application on determining height of water flowing fractured zone in upward slant hole[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 46 (5): 166-172.
    Ma K. 2016. Numerical simulation of S1224 working face dynamic water inflow in Ningtiaota coal mine[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Science and Technology.
    Ning J G, Liu X S, Tang Y L, et al. 2014. Fracture structure model of weakly cemented roof in shallow seam[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 31 (4): 569-574.
    Qian M G, Miao X X, He F L. 1994. Analysis of key block in the structure of voussoir beam in longwall mining[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 19 (6): 557-563.
    Ren D J, Sun Y Y, Li J Y. 2019. Hydrochemical characteristics and control of water hazard from coal seam roof in Gaojiabao coal mine[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 47 (S1): 26-31.
    Sun L H, Ji H G, Jiang H, et al. 2017. Experimental study on characteristics of broken caving and regularity of compaction deformation of rocks in caving zone in the weakly cemented strata[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 42 (10): 2565-2572.
    Shi L Q, Wu H B, Li Y L, et al. 2021. Optimization model of PCA-GA-Elman for development height prediction of water-conducting fissure zone[J]. Journal of Henan Polytehnic University(Natural Science), 40 (4): 10-18.
    Wu Q. 2014. Progress, problems and prospects of prevention and control technology of mine water and reutilization in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 39 (5): 795-805.
    Wang Y G, Wang M, Xu P. 2019. Characteristics of collapsed fractured zone development of No. 3-1 seam roof in Bayangaoler coal mine[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 47 (S1): 37-42.
    Wang Q M, Wang H, Yang J, et al. 2021. Hydrogeochemical characteristics of main water filled aquifers and source indicators of mine water intypical Jurassic mine area of western China[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 29 (4): 1084-1093.
    Xue J K, Wang H, Zhao C H, et al. 2020. Prediction of the height of water-conducting fracture zone and water-filling model of roof aquifer in Jurassic coalfield in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering, 37 (6): 1222-1230.
    Xu Z M, Sun Y J, Gao S, et al. 2019. Law of mining induced water conduction fissure in arid mining area and its significance in water-preserved coal mining[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 44 (3): 767-776.
    Yang D M, Guo W B, Zhao G B, et al. 2019. Height of water-conducting zone in longwall top-coal caving mining under thick alluvium and soft overburden[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 44 (11): 3308-3316.
    Zhang J M, Zhang K, Cao Z G, et al. 2017. Study on mining-bursting simulation and height calculation method for conducting-water fractured zone[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 42 (6): 1557-1564.
    Zhang Y, Cao S G, Lai X P, et al. 2019. Study on the development mechanism and control of water-conducting fractures in short-wall block backfill mining[J]. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering, 36 (6): 1086-1092.
    Zhang P S, Dong Y H, Zhang X L, et al. 2022. Statistical law analysis and forecast of coal mine water disaster accidents in China from 2008 to 2021[J]. Coal Engineering, 54 (11): 131-137.
    陈陆望, 王迎新, 欧庆华, 等. 2021. 考虑覆岩结构影响的近松散层开采导水裂隙带发育高度预测模型研究——以淮北煤田为例[J]. 工程地质学报, 29 (4): 1048-1056. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0319
    丁甲, 董东林, 胡志强, 等. 2021. 巨厚松散层下煤层开采的抗渗透性破坏和煤柱安全性研究——以口孜东矿为例[J]. 工程地质学报, 29 (4): 1071-1083. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0385
    董书宁, 姬亚东, 王皓, 等. 2020. 鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪煤田典型顶板水害防控技术与应用[J]. 煤炭学报, 45 (7): 2367-2375. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB202007005.htm
    樊振丽, 刘治国. 2020. 厚黏土层软弱覆岩采动破坏的泥盖效应[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 37 (6): 1196-1204. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KSYL202006015.htm
    侯伟. 2020. 红柳林矿5-2煤层充水性评价与水害防治技术研究[D]. 西安: 西安科技大学.
    侯荡. 2021. 我国煤炭资源绿色开采效率与保障对策研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京).
    刘天泉. 1981. 煤矿地表移动与覆岩破坏规律及其应用[M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社.
    林青, 乔伟. 2016. 崔木煤矿顶板离层水防治技术[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 44 (3): 129-134. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ201603025.htm
    来兴平, 崔峰, 曹建涛, 等. 2017. 三软煤层综放工作面覆岩垮落及裂隙导水特征分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 42 (1): 148-154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201701020.htm
    李超峰, 刘英锋, 李抗抗. 2018. 导水裂隙带高度井下仰孔探测装置改进及应用[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 46 (5): 166-172. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ201805027.htm
    马凯. 2016. 柠条塔煤矿S1224工作面涌水量动态数值模拟研究[D]. 西安: 西安科技大学.
    宁建国, 刘学生, 谭云亮, 等. 2014. 浅埋煤层工作面弱胶结顶板破断结构模型研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 31 (4): 569-574. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KSYL201404012.htm
    钱鸣高, 缪协兴, 何富连. 1994. 采场"砌体梁"结构的关键块分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 19 (6): 557-563. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB406.000.htm
    任邓君, 孙亚岳, 李建阳. 2019. 高家堡煤矿煤层顶板水水化学特征及其水害防治技术[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 47 (S1): 26-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MDKT2019S1005.htm
    孙利辉, 纪洪广, 蒋华, 等. 2017. 弱胶结地层条件下垮落带岩层破碎冒落特征与压实变形规律试验研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 42 (10): 2565-2572. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201710010.htm
    施龙青, 吴洪斌, 李永雷, 等. 2021. 导水裂隙带发育高度预测的PCA-GA-Elman优化模型[J]. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 40 (4): 10-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JGXB202104002.htm
    武强. 2014. 我国矿井水防控与资源化利用的研究进展、问题和展望[J]. 煤炭学报, 39 (5): 795-805. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201405001.htm
    王永国, 王明, 许蓬. 2019. 巴彦高勒煤矿3-1煤层顶板垮落裂缝带发育特征[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 47 (S1): 37-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MDKT2019S1007.htm
    王强民, 王皓, 杨建, 等. 2021. 西部侏罗系矿区充水含水层水文地球化学特征及矿井水来源综合识别[J]. 工程地质学报, 29 (4): 1084-1093. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0367
    薛建坤, 王皓, 赵春虎, 等. 2020. 鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗系煤田导水裂隙带高度预测及顶板充水模式[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 37 (6): 1222-1230. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KSYL202006018.htm
    徐智敏, 孙亚军, 高尚, 等. 2019. 干旱矿区采动顶板导水裂隙的演化规律及保水采煤意义[J]. 煤炭学报, 44 (3): 767-776. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201903013.htm
    杨达明, 郭文兵, 赵高博, 等. 2019. 厚松散层软弱覆岩下综放开采导水裂隙带发育高度[J]. 煤炭学报, 44 (11): 3308-3316. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201911003.htm
    张建民, 张凯, 曹志国, 等. 2017. 基于采动-爆裂模型的导水裂隙带高度计算方法[J]. 煤炭学报, 42 (6): 1557-1564. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201706024.htm
    张云, 曹胜根, 来兴平, 等. 2019. 短壁块段式充填采煤覆岩导水裂隙发育机理及控制研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 36 (6): 1086-1092. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KSYL201906003.htm
    张培森, 董宇航, 张晓乐, 等. 2022.2008~2021年我国煤矿水害事故统计规律分析及预测研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 54 (11): 131-137. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MKSJ202211024.htm
  • 加载中
图(10) / 表(7)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  113
  • HTML全文浏览量:  21
  • PDF下载量:  33
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-06-02
  • 修回日期:  2023-07-18
  • 刊出日期:  2023-08-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回