介玉新, 武海鹏, 徐曦. 2014: 加筋土不同计算方法的比较. 工程地质学报, 22(s1): 377-382. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2014.s1.063
    引用本文: 介玉新, 武海鹏, 徐曦. 2014: 加筋土不同计算方法的比较. 工程地质学报, 22(s1): 377-382. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2014.s1.063
    Jie Yuxin, Wu Haipeng, Xu Xi. 2014: COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT COMPUTING METHODS FOR REINFORCED SOIL. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 22(s1): 377-382. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2014.s1.063
    Citation: Jie Yuxin, Wu Haipeng, Xu Xi. 2014: COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT COMPUTING METHODS FOR REINFORCED SOIL. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 22(s1): 377-382. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2014.s1.063

    加筋土不同计算方法的比较

    COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT COMPUTING METHODS FOR REINFORCED SOIL

    • 摘要: 分离式、整体式和组合式方法都可以用于加筋土和钢筋混凝土的数值计算,它们在本质上是一致的。针对一典型加筋土结构,分别采用分离式、整体式和组合式方法进行计算比较,其中组合式方法考虑了筋材位于土单元的1/3和2/3高度位置两种情况。计算结果表明,不同方法的计算结果仅在边界附近约两列单元范围内有差别,在计算域内部计算结果基本相同。研究成果有助于加筋土计算方法的合理选择和应用。

       

      Abstract: The three commonly used methods, separate method, integral method and combined method can all be used to conduct numerical simulation of reinforced soil and reinforced concrete. The three methods are actually the same in the essence. In this paper, separate method, integral method and combined method are employed respectively to calculate a reinforced soil system and the results are compared. Two cases are considered for the combined method:one is considering the reinforcement being located at 1/3 of the height of the soil element, the other is assuming the reinforcement lying at 2/3 of the height. It is found that the results by different methods differ only in the range near the boundary of the computational domain, which is about two columns of elements. The results are almost the same deeper in the computational domain. The study is thought to be helpful in the application and selection of computational methods for reinforced soil.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回