耿招, 张彬, 李伟瀚, 黄峰, 王汉勋. 2018: 不同开挖方法偏压大跨隧道围岩稳定性对比分析. 工程地质学报, 26(4): 866-873. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2017-332
    引用本文: 耿招, 张彬, 李伟瀚, 黄峰, 王汉勋. 2018: 不同开挖方法偏压大跨隧道围岩稳定性对比分析. 工程地质学报, 26(4): 866-873. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2017-332
    GENG Zhao, ZHANG Bin, LI Weihan, HUANG Feng, WANG Hanxun. 2018: COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS ON SURROUNDING ROCK STABILITY OF BIAS LARGE SPAN TUNNEL WITH DIFFERENT EXCAVATION METHODS. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 26(4): 866-873. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2017-332
    Citation: GENG Zhao, ZHANG Bin, LI Weihan, HUANG Feng, WANG Hanxun. 2018: COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS ON SURROUNDING ROCK STABILITY OF BIAS LARGE SPAN TUNNEL WITH DIFFERENT EXCAVATION METHODS. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 26(4): 866-873. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2017-332

    不同开挖方法偏压大跨隧道围岩稳定性对比分析

    COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS ON SURROUNDING ROCK STABILITY OF BIAS LARGE SPAN TUNNEL WITH DIFFERENT EXCAVATION METHODS

    • 摘要: 偏压地形对大跨隧道的围岩变形和支护结构受力有较大的负面影响,科学选择开挖方法是确保隧道施工安全的重要前提。Hoek-Brown强度准则综合考虑岩体结构面特征、岩块强度和施工扰动对岩体劣化效应的影响,能更好地反映隧道开挖过程中围岩的变形情况。据此,本文以贵阳市环城路七冲村二号隧道为工程依托,通过现场调查及经验查表的方法确定了Hoek-Brown强度参数,采用FLAC3D对三台阶法和双侧壁导洞法的开挖过程进行了模拟计算,结合现场围岩变形和钢拱架轴力监测数据,对两种开挖方法的围岩稳定性进行了对比分析,得出结论:相比于三台阶法,双侧壁导洞法能更有效地控制围岩塑性区发展和围岩变形,可以有效地减少偏压荷载对隧道围岩造成的不利影响,但钢拱架受力不均匀,可能对支护结构稳定产生不利影响;综合考虑施工安全和施工进度,围岩较破碎的隧道出口段和入口段应采用双侧壁导洞法施工,围岩较完整的其他区间段可采用三台阶法施工,以节省工期。

       

      Abstract: The bias topography has a great negative influence on the deformation of surrounding rocks and the forces of supporting structure of a large span tunnel. A scientific selection of excavation method is an important prerequisite to ensure the safety of tunnel construction. The Hoek-Brown strength criterion takes account of the influence of rock mass structure surface, rock mass strength and construction disturbance on rock mass deterioration. This can better reflect the deformation of surrounding rock during tunneling. Therefore, this paper selects a typical engineering project relying on No. 2 tunnel in Qichong village, Huancheng Road, Guiyang City, determines the Hoek-Brown strength parameters based on site investigations and empirical method as well as used, and simulates the excavation processes with both three-step method and double-wall guide method. Compared with the field data of rock deformation and the axial force of steel arch, the double-wall guide method can better control the development of the plastic zone and the deformation of surrounding rock. It can also better alleviate the adverse effect of bias load on the surrounding rock. But the force acting on steel arches is more uneven, which is not conducive to the stability of supporting structure. Considering the construction safety and construction progress, the double-side wall guide method should be used to construct the tunnel outlet and the entrance section with relatively broken rock, while the three-step method can be used for the remainder with more integral rock.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回