赵梦怡, 谢强, 康景文, 李朝阳, 郭永春. 2018: 柔性支护黏性土基坑非极限被动土压力研究. 工程地质学报, 26(4): 898-904. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2017-375
    引用本文: 赵梦怡, 谢强, 康景文, 李朝阳, 郭永春. 2018: 柔性支护黏性土基坑非极限被动土压力研究. 工程地质学报, 26(4): 898-904. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2017-375
    ZHAO Mengyi, XIE Qiang, KANG Jingwen, LI Zhaoyang, GUO Yongchun. 2018: PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE OF COHESIVE SOIL UNDER NONLIMIT STATE AGAINST FLEXIBLE RETAINING STRUCTURE. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 26(4): 898-904. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2017-375
    Citation: ZHAO Mengyi, XIE Qiang, KANG Jingwen, LI Zhaoyang, GUO Yongchun. 2018: PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE OF COHESIVE SOIL UNDER NONLIMIT STATE AGAINST FLEXIBLE RETAINING STRUCTURE. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 26(4): 898-904. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2017-375

    柔性支护黏性土基坑非极限被动土压力研究

    PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE OF COHESIVE SOIL UNDER NONLIMIT STATE AGAINST FLEXIBLE RETAINING STRUCTURE

    • 摘要: 经典的Rankine和Coulomb土压力计算理论均建立在土体达到极限平衡状态的基础上,并不适用于位移需要严格控制的基坑工程。以柔性支护的黏性土基坑边坡为研究对象,考虑边坡土拱效应、非极限状态下柔性支护结构与土体间内摩擦角以及黏聚力发挥值、土体内摩擦角以及黏聚力发挥值的影响,从黏性土应力莫尔圆出发,采用微层分析法建立静力平衡,搜索边坡土体潜在滑动面,推导柔性支护黏性土基坑的非极限被动土压力计算式。通过实例计算对比分析了本文计算理论与经典Rankine计算理论,推导公式计算得到的被动土压力小于Rankine计算值19%,合力作用位置低于Rankine计算值,作用位置距桩底距离较Rankine计算值小1.5%,计算得到的潜在滑动面为一水平倾角随深度逐渐减小的曲面,潜在滑动面范围小于Rankine极限状态滑动面。

       

      Abstract: Classical Rankine and Coulomb earth pressure theories are both calculated on the basis of limit equilibrium state. Thus they are not appropriate for foundation pit engineering because the displacements must be strictly controlled. Cohesive soil slope supported by flexible retaining structure is studied. It considers the influence of the soil arching effects, the value of the internal friction angle and cohesive force between flexible retaining structure and soil, and the value of the internal friction angle and cohesive force between soil and soil. The potential slope sliding surface is searched. The formulas of the passive earth pressure of cohesive soil under nonlimit state against flexible retaining structure is derived via Mohr circle of stress, micro layer analysis method and static equilibrium. The difference between the theory in this paper and Rankine theory is researched from analysis of engineering example. The passive earth pressure calculated by the theory in this paper is smaller. The location impacted by resultant force of the passive earth pressure is lower. The distance from the location to the bottom of the pile is 1.5 percent smaller than that of Rankine theory. The potential sliding surface is a curved surface of horizontal angles decrease with depth. The scope of potential sliding surface is less than the scope of sliding surface under Rankine limit state.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回