高广运, 司志鹏, 李永佳, 耿建龙. 2020: 地震荷载类型及相对密度对饱和砂土液化变形的影响. 工程地质学报, 28(S1): 1-8. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2020-377
    引用本文: 高广运, 司志鹏, 李永佳, 耿建龙. 2020: 地震荷载类型及相对密度对饱和砂土液化变形的影响. 工程地质学报, 28(S1): 1-8. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2020-377
    GAO Guangyun, SI Zhipeng, LI Yongjia, GENG Jianlong. 2020: EFFECT OF SEISMIC LOAD TYPE AND RELATIVE DENSITY ON LIQUEFACTION DEFORMATION OF SATURATED SAND. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 28(S1): 1-8. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2020-377
    Citation: GAO Guangyun, SI Zhipeng, LI Yongjia, GENG Jianlong. 2020: EFFECT OF SEISMIC LOAD TYPE AND RELATIVE DENSITY ON LIQUEFACTION DEFORMATION OF SATURATED SAND. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 28(S1): 1-8. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2020-377

    地震荷载类型及相对密度对饱和砂土液化变形的影响

    EFFECT OF SEISMIC LOAD TYPE AND RELATIVE DENSITY ON LIQUEFACTION DEFORMATION OF SATURATED SAND

    • 摘要: 为研究地震荷载类型和砂土相对密度对饱和砂土液化变形的影响,基于有限元平台Opensees建立了变渗透系数、一维剪切梁土柱模型,并与离心机试验结果对比验证了模型的正确性。选取El-Centro地震波和Northridge地震波作为输入荷载,分析了冲击型与振动型地震波作用下砂土相对密度对土柱竖向位移和超静孔压比的影响。研究表明,振动型地震波作用下土体竖向位移明显大于冲击型;增大土体相对密度可有效减小竖向沉降,且振动型地震波作用时的减小效果比冲击型地震波更明显;土体相对密度相同时,冲击型地震波作用下的最大孔压比大于振动型地震波,但其高孔压的持续时间较短,孔压消散过程较快;松砂更易达到液化条件。

       

      Abstract: This paper is based on the finite element platform Opensees. It established a one-dimensional shear beam soil column model with variable permeability coefficient and the accuracy of the model was verified by a centrifuge test results. The target is to explore the effect of seismic load type and relative density of sand on liquefaction deformation of saturated sand. Therefore, We selected the El-Centro seismic wave and Northridge seismic wave as inputting load. The simulated vertical displacement and excess pore pressure ratio of soil column under impact and vibration seismic wave were compared and analyzed when the relative density of sand was different. The results show that the vertical displacement under the vibration seismic wave is obviously larger than impact type; The increase of relative density can effectively reduce the vertical settlement of soil, and the effect is more obvious under the action of vibration seismic wave than that of impact seismic wave; The maximum pore pressure ratio of shock type seismic wave is larger than that of vibration type seismic wave, but the duration of high pore pressure is shorter and the dissipation process of pore pressure is faster; Loose sand is easier to achieve liquefaction conditions.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回