宫凤强, 潘俊锋, 江权. 2021. 岩爆和冲击地压的差异解析及深部工程地质灾害关键机理问题[J]. 工程地质学报, 29(4): 933-961. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0555.
    引用本文: 宫凤强, 潘俊锋, 江权. 2021. 岩爆和冲击地压的差异解析及深部工程地质灾害关键机理问题[J]. 工程地质学报, 29(4): 933-961. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0555.
    Gong Fengqiang, Pan Junfeng, Jiang Quan. 2021. The difference analysis of rock burst and coal burst and key mechanisms of deep engineering geological hazards[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 29(4): 933-961. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0555.
    Citation: Gong Fengqiang, Pan Junfeng, Jiang Quan. 2021. The difference analysis of rock burst and coal burst and key mechanisms of deep engineering geological hazards[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 29(4): 933-961. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0555.

    岩爆和冲击地压的差异解析及深部工程地质灾害关键机理问题

    THE DIFFERENCE ANALYSIS OF ROCK BURST AND COAL BURST AND KEY MECHANISMS OF DEEP ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL HAZARDS

    • 摘要: 岩爆和冲击地压原来在自然界并不存在,完全是由于人类进行深部地下空间利用、深部矿产资源开采等工程建设时诱发产生的,两者同属于最典型的深部工程地质灾害。由于历史原因,岩爆和冲击地压长期存在概念混用的情况。本文比较详细地综述了岩爆和冲击地压领域国内早期的研究历程,系统解析了岩爆和冲击地压之间存在的差异。在研究对象(硬岩和煤的承载强度、储能及释能能力、弹脆性)、受力条件(地应力、扰动应力)和边界条件(开挖和开采方法及工序、扰动范围和时效性等)方面,岩爆和冲击地压均存在根本区别;在表观现象、限定对象、研究对象、赋存条件、行业领域、工程建设方法、工程建设目的、要求及支护性质、诱发机理、倾向性判据、划分类型、划分等级、等级评价方法等方面,岩爆和冲击地压也存在很大差异。综上,岩爆和冲击地压是并列的两类地质体动力破坏现象,两者之间不存在隶属关系。在综合参考前人研究的基础上,分别给出了岩爆和冲击地压各自的定义和内涵。岩爆的定义为发生在深埋隧道(隧洞)、深部矿山巷道及矿柱部位的硬岩弹射、爆裂或崩落现象,伴随不同程度声响;冲击地压定义为发生在深部煤矿中煤抛出现象,释放出不同程度的动能,严重时往往伴随震动、巨响、气浪或冲击波。从煤动力冲击破坏的现象与名称统一的角度考虑,建议用“煤冲击”代替“冲击地压”概念。在此基础上,详细阐述了岩爆和冲击地压研究中的7点认识。最后,从研究对象、受力条件和边界条件等3个方面讨论了岩爆和冲击地压的关键机理问题,即从静动(或动静)组合加载力学的角度研究岩爆和冲击地压,符合深部地质体破坏的全受力路径,同时要从能量守恒的角度研究从静态到动态的转换问题。在岩爆和冲击地压的机理分析、预测预报、监测报警、调控防治中,都要科学认识各影响因素之间的逻辑关系和辩证关系(注:本文因为无法找到与冲击地压契合的英文名称,在英文摘要中同时存在“coal burst”和“coal bump”两种表达)。

       

      Abstract: Rock burst and coal burst did not originally exist in nature, which were completely induced by humans'project construction such as during utilization of deep underground space and exploitation of deep mineral resources. Both of them belong to the most typical deep engineering geological hazards. For a long time, the concepts of rock burst and coal burst have been confused. This article reviewed the early research progress of rock burst and coal burst in China, and systematically analyzed the difference between them. There were fundamental differences between rock burst and coal burst in the research objects(bearing strength, energy storage and release capacity, and elastic brittleness of hard rock and coal), stress conditions(in-situ stress, disturbance stress) and boundary conditions(excavation & mining methods and procedures, disturbance range and timeliness, etc.). There were also great differences between rock burst and coal burst in the aspects of apparent phenomenon, restricted object, research object, occurrence condition, industry field, engineering construction method, engineering construction purpose, inducing mechanism, requirements and supporting principle, tendency criterion, classification type, classification grade, grade evaluation method, and so on. In conclusion, rock burst and coal burst were two kinds of parallel dynamic failure phenomena of geological body, and no subordinate relationship occurred between them. Based on the previous studies, the definition and connotation of rock burst and coal burst were given respectively. Rock burst was defined as the ejection, burst or caving phenomenon of hard rock occurring in deep buried opening(tunnel), mine roadway and pillar, accompanied by different degrees of sound. Coal burst was defined as the phenomenon that occurs in deep coal mines when coal was thrown out and releases different degrees of kinetic energy, often accompanied by vibration, loud noise, air wave or shock wave in server cases. It is suggested to replace the term "coal bump" with "coal burst" in consideration of the dynamic coal failure phenomenon and the appellative consistency. On this basis, seven viewpoints are expounded in detail in understanding the rock burst and coal burst. Finally, several key mechanisms of rock burst and coal burst were proposed from the aspects of research object, stress and boundary conditions. That is, investigations of rock burst and coal burst from the perspective of coupled static-dynamic(or dynamic-static) loading mechanics favorably agree with the full stress path of deep geological body failure, and the transformation from static state to dynamic state should be studied from the viewpoint of energy conservation. In the mechanism analysis, prediction and forecast, monitoring and early warning, regulation and control of rock burst and coal burst, the logical and dialectical relations among influencing factors should be understood scientifically.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回