刘世凯, 苏爱军, 唐小兵, 刘红星. 2004: 长江中下游重点堤岸稳定性分析. 工程地质学报, 12(S1): 129-133.
    引用本文: 刘世凯, 苏爱军, 唐小兵, 刘红星. 2004: 长江中下游重点堤岸稳定性分析. 工程地质学报, 12(S1): 129-133.
    LIU Shikai, SU Aijun, TANG Xiaobing, LIU Hongxing. 2004: STABILITY ANALYSIS OF EMBANKMENT IN THE MIDDLE AND LOWER REACHES OF YANGTZE RIVER. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 12(S1): 129-133.
    Citation: LIU Shikai, SU Aijun, TANG Xiaobing, LIU Hongxing. 2004: STABILITY ANALYSIS OF EMBANKMENT IN THE MIDDLE AND LOWER REACHES OF YANGTZE RIVER. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 12(S1): 129-133.

    长江中下游重点堤岸稳定性分析

    STABILITY ANALYSIS OF EMBANKMENT IN THE MIDDLE AND LOWER REACHES OF YANGTZE RIVER

    • 摘要: 长江堤防安全的稳定性是国家领导人一直很关注的大事。本文介绍了长江中下游重点堤岸典型堤段(黄冈段)的地质背景,包括地理位置及水文气象、地形地貌及河势特征、地质构造及地层岩性、水文地质及堤岸物质组成等,对该典型堤段进行了稳定性分析。通过对不同条件下的土体稳定性计算与分析,表明堤岸土体在涨水和水位维持时期的稳定性要比天然状态时高,而在水位快速下降时,稳定性则迅速降低,此时,堤岸易产生滑坡。对于堤岸土体力学特性而言,弹性模量、泊松比和质量密度3个参数中,对稳定性影响最灵敏的是质量密度,次为泊松比,而弹性模量不敏感。对强度指标c、φ值而言,通常认为破坏面内摩擦角对安全系数的影响要比凝聚力c大得多。实际上,这是有条件的,即在深层滑坡的情况下,上述论点可成立,而对于浅层滑坡而言,凝聚力c对安全系数的影响则明显增加。反过来说,当滑动面倾角一定时,对浅层滑坡问题,凝聚力c的数值通常比较小,而对深层滑坡问题,凝聚力c的数值则往往比较大。由此提醒,在浅层滑坡滑面土体的物理力学参数实验获取时,应对凝聚力c给予更多关注。

       

      Abstract: The security and stability of Yangtze River embankment is an important matter that has been paid close attention to by national leader. In this paper the geologic condition of representative dyke in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River is introduced, which includes geographical position, hydrometeorology, topography and physiognomy, geological structure, stratum lithology and dyke matter and so on. The stability analysis of the dyke is discussed. Numerical examples show that dyke is steadier the days of river water level rising or keeping than the days of the dyke being nature. The safety factor of embankment stability drop suddenly when the water level falls rapidly, and landslide will happen in all probability.Of all the parameters of elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio and mass density the most sensitive parameter for the embankment stability is mass density, and modulus of elasticity is the smallest sensitive one. For the intension indexes of cohesion c and friction angle φ on the gliding surface, it is common sense that the influence of φ to the safety factor is much more remarkable than that c. In fact, it is conditional. That is correct if the depth of landslide is large, but the influence of c to the safety factor enhances obviously if the depth of landslide is small. So the parameter c should be paid more attention for a shallow landslide.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回