许鹏, 王清, 齐迪, 鲍硕超. 2012: 我国北方某热电厂桩载试验研究. 工程地质学报, 20(1): 138-143.
    引用本文: 许鹏, 王清, 齐迪, 鲍硕超. 2012: 我国北方某热电厂桩载试验研究. 工程地质学报, 20(1): 138-143.
    XU Peng, WANG Qing, QI Di, BAO Shuochao. 2012: COMPARISONS OF TWO PILE LOAD TESTING METHODS AT HEAT AND POWER PLANT IN NORTH CHINA. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 20(1): 138-143.
    Citation: XU Peng, WANG Qing, QI Di, BAO Shuochao. 2012: COMPARISONS OF TWO PILE LOAD TESTING METHODS AT HEAT AND POWER PLANT IN NORTH CHINA. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 20(1): 138-143.

    我国北方某热电厂桩载试验研究

    COMPARISONS OF TWO PILE LOAD TESTING METHODS AT HEAT AND POWER PLANT IN NORTH CHINA

    • 摘要: 高应变动测法目前得到了越来越广泛的应用,研究其测试结果的可靠性对实际工程具有重要意义。对PHC桩应用高应变法、竖向静载方法进行试验,以确定桩基的单桩极限承载力。首先对2组不同直径的6根试桩进行高应变测试,采用国际上推荐的GOBLE-CAPWAPC-CASE方法,得到试桩的单桩极限承载力; 然后按慢速维持荷载法进行竖向抗压静载试验,将所得极限承载力与高应变法所得结果进行对比,高应变法所得结果高于静载试验的结果, 2种方法结果不同是由于2种方法的测试原理、计算方法、影响因素等不同所致。高应变法的理想化桩-土体系以及主要参数的设定对结果都有很大的影响,实际试验中应充分考虑如何取值。

       

      Abstract: High strain dynamic testing method has been more widely used now.It is important to study the reliability of test results for projects.In this paper,the ultimate bearing capacity of single PHC pile is determined by static loading test and high strain test.There are two different diameters of the six test piles.At first,the six piles are tested with the high strain method.The results are obtained with the GOBLE-CAPWAPC-CASE method.Then the piles are tested with the static vertical load testing and slow maintenance loading method.Comparing the results of the two methods,the bearing capacity of the piles by the high strain dynamic testing method is higher than that of the piles tested by the static loading test.The differences are relative with the testing principles,calculating methods and different affecting factors of the two methods.The idealized pile-soil system and how to set the main parameters of high strain method have great influence on the results.How to use the values should be fully considered in testing.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回