张年学, 盛祝平. 2015: 倾斜隔水层潜水含水层一维稳定流的新解析解. 工程地质学报, 23(s1): 223-228. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2015.s1.036
    引用本文: 张年学, 盛祝平. 2015: 倾斜隔水层潜水含水层一维稳定流的新解析解. 工程地质学报, 23(s1): 223-228. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2015.s1.036
    ZHANG Nianxue, SHENG Zhuping. 2015: NEW ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS FOR ONE DIMENSIONAL STEADY STATE FLOW IN AN UNCONFINED AQUIFER WITH A SLOPING BASE. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 23(s1): 223-228. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2015.s1.036
    Citation: ZHANG Nianxue, SHENG Zhuping. 2015: NEW ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS FOR ONE DIMENSIONAL STEADY STATE FLOW IN AN UNCONFINED AQUIFER WITH A SLOPING BASE. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 23(s1): 223-228. DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2015.s1.036

    倾斜隔水层潜水含水层一维稳定流的新解析解

    NEW ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS FOR ONE DIMENSIONAL STEADY STATE FLOW IN AN UNCONFINED AQUIFER WITH A SLOPING BASE

    • 摘要: 具有小倾角隔水层的松散沉积在自然界中广泛存在, 研究在这种沉积层中的渗流对许多水文工程问题有实际的意义。对这一问题最著名的解析方法是巴甫洛夫斯基法, 由于它的假设条件是流线的发散角很小, 所以该方法只适用于隔水层倾角很小和边界水位差不大的情况。本文提出一种新的解析方法, 对隔水层正倾和反倾两种情况, 选取适当坐标, 将含水层分为上下两部分, 根据层间越流流量变化率相等原理与质量守恒定律, 导出全微分方程, 获得了解析解。对文献中的4个算例进行计算, 与巴甫洛夫斯基方法结果进行了对比, 其渗流量几乎完全一致, 而水位浸润曲线则随隔水层倾角与边界水位差大小(表现为水力坡度大小, 即与流线发散与收敛角有关)而与巴氏方法结果有所差别, 这种差别随隔水层倾角或边界水位差增大而增加。根据原理分析, 本方法计算浸润曲线精度可能比巴氏方法要高, 并能适用边界水位差与隔水层倾角较大(影响流线发散角与收敛角大小)的情况。

       

      Abstract: Loose sediments with a gentle-inclined impermeable base are widespread in nature. Therefore studies of seepage flows in this kind of sedimentary formation is of critical importance in many hydraulic engineering practices. The most famous analytical solution for this problem is Pavlovskii's method. However it is only applicable to the aquifer of a small slope angle and a small head difference between two boundaries because of its assumption that the divergence angle flow lines should be small. This paper presents a new analytical method for an aquifer with a downward-and counter-sloping base. An appropriate coordinate system was first chosen to divide the aquifer into two parts, one above and another below the x axis. A total differential equation was derived according to equivalent flux across the interface between two parts and the principle of mass conservation(continuity).Analytical solution was then obtained by solving the total differential equation with specified boundary conditions. The method was used in four examples taken from literatures. The results were compared with Pavlovskii's solutions. The discharge is almost identical, but the difference of phreatic surfaces between two methods increases as the slope angle rises and the head difference become larger(expressed as hydraulic slope, related to the divergence and convergence angles of streamlines).Based on analysis of hydraulic mechanisms, the new method presented in this paper provides higher accuracy for calculating phreatic surface than the Pavlovskii's method. It can also be applied to an aquifer with a higher slope angle of the base and greater head difference between boundaries(affecting convergence and divergence angles of streamlines).

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回