程伟, 孙梦雅, 徐洪兵, 等. 2023. 基于AHFO-FBG的黄土含水率不同率定方法对比分析[J]. 工程地质学报, 31 (3): 1073-1083. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0037.
    引用本文: 程伟, 孙梦雅, 徐洪兵, 等. 2023. 基于AHFO-FBG的黄土含水率不同率定方法对比分析[J]. 工程地质学报, 31 (3): 1073-1083. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0037.
    Cheng Wei, Sun Mengya, Xu Hongbing, et al. 2023. Comparative analysis of different measuring methods of loess moisture content based on AHFO-FBG method[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 31(3): 1073-1083. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0037.
    Citation: Cheng Wei, Sun Mengya, Xu Hongbing, et al. 2023. Comparative analysis of different measuring methods of loess moisture content based on AHFO-FBG method[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 31(3): 1073-1083. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0037.

    基于AHFO-FBG的黄土含水率不同率定方法对比分析

    COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT MEASURING METHODS OF LOESS MOISTURE CONTENT BASED ON AHFO-FBG METHOD

    • 摘要: 主动加热光纤布拉格光栅法(Actively Heated Fiber-Optic method based on Fiber Bragg grating method,AHFO-FBG method)因具有体积小、测温精度高、准分布式测量、抗电磁干扰、耐腐蚀等优点,近年来成为含水率测量技术的研究热点。研究该技术的率定方法对提高含水率测量的精准性和适用性是十分关键的,但现有研究中均未涉及到此内容。因此,本文采用自主研发的AHFO-FBG传感器对黄土开展了一系列率定试验,研究了ΔTmax和ΔTcum两种率定方法的含水率率定结果,对此两种方法进行了对比分析。同时,进一步探究了不同加热时长和不同加热功率对ΔTmax法和ΔTcum法率定结果的影响。研究结果表明:ΔTmax和ΔTcum法均可得到良好的含水率率定结果,ΔTmax法的RMSE比ΔTcum法高0.001 m3·m-3,ΔTcum法的测量优势不是很显著。在相同加热功率下,ΔTmax法和ΔTcum法均在较短加热时间下的测量误差较小,且加热时间越短,ΔTcum法较ΔTmax法的优势越明显;在相同加热时间下,低功率(5~10 W·m-1)时ΔTmax法的RMSE较小,高功率(15~35 W·m-1)时ΔTcum法的RMSE较小,且适当的增加热功率有助于减少含水率率定误差。研究成果为AHFO-FBG技术实现土体含水率的精确测量和进一步应用提供了依据。

       

      Abstract: The Actively Heated Fiber Optic method is based on Fiber Bragg grating method(AHFO-FBG)technology and has become the latest research hotspots due to its advantages of small size, high temperature measurement accuracy, quasi-distributed measurement, anti-electromagnetic interference, and corrosion resistance. Research on the calibration method of this technology is very critical to improve the accuracy and applicability of moisture content measurement, but this content is not involved in the existing research. In this paper, the self-developed AHFO-FBG sensor is used to carry out a series of indoor calibration tests to determine the temperature change process of loess under various moisture contents. A comparative analysis of the moisture content measurement results of the ΔTmax method and the ΔTcum method is carried out in this paper. The influence of different heating time and different heating power on the calibration results of the ΔTmax method and the ΔTcum method is further explored. The results show that both ΔTmax method and the ΔTcum method can get good moisture content calibration results. The RMSE of the ΔTmax method is 0.001 m3·m-3 higher than that of the ΔTcum method, so the advantage of the ΔTcum method is not very significant. The ΔTmax and the ΔTcum method show that the longer the heating time, the error of the two methods to measure the moisture content can gradually increase. Under the same heating time, the ΔTcum method calculates the moisture content better than the ΔTmax method, and the shorter the heating time, the more obvious the phenomenon. Under the same heating power, the RMSE of ΔTmax method is small in the low power(5~10 W·m-1), and the RMSE of ΔTcum method is small in the high power(15~35 W·m-1). An appropriate increase in the heating power can help reduce the moisture content calibration error. The research results provide a basis for the AHFO-FBG technology to achieve accurate measurement and further application of soil moisture content.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回