郭剑, 崔一飞. 2023. 滑坡-泥石流转化研究进展[J]. 工程地质学报, 31(3): 762-779. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2022-0771.
    引用本文: 郭剑, 崔一飞. 2023. 滑坡-泥石流转化研究进展[J]. 工程地质学报, 31(3): 762-779. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2022-0771.
    Guo Jian, Cui Yifei. 2023. An overview of landslide-induced debris flow[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 31(3): 762-779. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2022-0771.
    Citation: Guo Jian, Cui Yifei. 2023. An overview of landslide-induced debris flow[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 31(3): 762-779. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2022-0771.

    滑坡-泥石流转化研究进展

    AN OVERVIEW OF LANDSLIDE-INDUCED DEBRIS FLOW

    • 摘要: 近年来,随着山区工程建设日益活跃,由滑坡转化为泥石流所导致的巨型远程沟谷灾害,因其超强的运动性和巨大的破坏性而引起广泛关注。与单灾种滑坡相比,转化后的泥石流灾害规模更大、运动距离更远、流动性更强、危害程度更严重。科学的认识滑坡-泥石流转化过程,对从起始环节降低远程沟谷灾害风险,进而采取针对性减灾措施具有重要意义。本文基于现阶段国内外研究成果,系统综述了滑坡-泥石流灾害转化的概念、转化条件和转化机理。首先,对比高速远程滑坡-碎屑流,明确了滑坡-泥石流转化的概念。随后,从物源、水源和地形3个角度梳理了滑坡-泥石流转化的宏观条件,进一步梳理了现阶段用于划分滑坡、泥石流的静态、动态指标和方法。基于典型滑坡-泥石流转化野外案例和模型实验,总结了滑坡-泥石流转化的两种模式:“静-动”转化和“动-动”转化,分别就不同转化模式所对应的孕灾条件和物理机制进行了探讨。最后,基于对现有成果的分析,提出了滑坡-泥石流转化研究所面临的3个关键科学问题,指出了滑坡-泥石流转化研究可借鉴的相关理论和方法,探讨了未来滑坡-泥石流转化过程及物理机制分析的研究方法。

       

      Abstract: With the increasingly active engineering construction in mountainous areas these years, the giant remote gully disaster chain induced by landslide-debris flow transformation has attracted widespread attention for its superb motility and huge destructive power. Compared with the single hazard of landslide, the transformed debris flow has significantly increased in disaster scale, movement form, affected scope, and construction damage degree. Therefore, scientifically understanding the process and mechanism of landslide-induced debris flow is important to reduce the risk of remote gully disaster chain from the beginning, and subsequently, choose suitable mitigation measures. This study systematically reviews the concept, conditions, and mechanism of landslide-induced debris flow based on recent research achievements in the world. First, the concept of landslide-debris flow transformation is clarified by comparing it with the phenomenon of high-speed and long-runout landslides. Subsequently, we sort out the transformation conditions of landslide-induced debris flow from three perspectives of solid material, water source, and topography. We find the landslide can transform into debris flow only if it is satisfied with a combination of both three conditions. We further sort out the static and dynamic indicators that are used to classify landslides and debris flows from the microscopic scale. The results indicate a combination of both static and dynamic indicators may be the suitable choice to quantitatively the transformation process. Based on a large number of cases of landslide-induced debris flow, we also summarize two modes of landslide-debris flow transformation, which fall into static and dynamic transformation. The physical mechanisms are further discussed. Finally, we propose three key scientific challenges for landslide-debris flow transformation study: (1)Scientific and quantitative characterization of landslide-debris flow transformation processes; (2)Mechanism of the phase change when coupled solid, liquid, and gas in disaster; and (3)Critical conditions of landslide-debris flow transformation based on physical mechanisms. We further point out the relevant theories and methods for transformation mechanism study, and their feasibility in quantitatively characterizing the physical mechanism analysis of landslide-debris flow transformation process is also discussed.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回