Volume 27 Issue s1
Dec.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY  > 2019  >  27(s1): 164-171
WU Chenguang, LU Meng, ZHANG Jie, ZHAO Jiang. 2019: PROBABILISTIC PREDICTION OF RAIN-INDUCED LANDSLIDE TRAVEL DISTANCE. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 27(s1): 164-171. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2019051
Citation: WU Chenguang, LU Meng, ZHANG Jie, ZHAO Jiang. 2019: PROBABILISTIC PREDICTION OF RAIN-INDUCED LANDSLIDE TRAVEL DISTANCE. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 27(s1): 164-171. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2019051
shu

PROBABILISTIC PREDICTION OF RAIN-INDUCED LANDSLIDE TRAVEL DISTANCE

doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2019051

  • 1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Education Ministry, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092;

  • 2. Southwest Transportation Construction Group Co., Ltd., Kunming 650000

Funds:

This study is supported by Transportation Technology Program of Yunnan Province (Grant No. 2018-26)

  • Received Date: 2019-05-24
  • Rev Recd Date: 2019-07-02
    Abstract
  • Rain-induced landslide is a common geological hazard. The consequence of landslide hazard is closely related to its travel distance. The prediction of rain-induced landslide horizontal travel distance is the basis of quantitative risk assessment. This paper built a database through collecting 309 cases of rain-induced landslides systematically. According to the database, we statistically analyzed the horizontal travel distance, volume, vertical travel distance, initial slope gradient and aspect ratio. Then we developed a calibration method of rain-induced landslides travel distance empirical model considering both confined and unconfined landslides. The proposed method could not only get the prediction of horizontal travel distance, but also the model error and confidence interval. Single factor analysis shows that the correlation of vertical travel distance with horizontal travel distance is highest, following are volume, aspect ratio and initial slope gradient. Stepwise regression analysis shows that the prediction model of rain-induced landslides based on the vertical travel distance, volume and aspect ratio is the fittest.
    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(44)
  • Chen H X,Zhang L M,Gao L,et al. 2015. Presenting regional shallow landslide movement on three-dimensional digital terrain[J]. Engineering Geology,195:122-134.
    Devoli G,Blasio F V D,Elverhøi A,et al. 2009. Statistical Analysis of Landslide Events in Central Americaand their Run-out Distance[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering,27(1):23-42.
    Evans S G,Hungr O,Clague J J. 2001. Dynamics of the 1984 rock avalanche and associated distal debris flow on Mount Cayley, British Columbia, Canada; implications for landslide hazard assessment on dissected volcanoes[J]. Engineering Geology,61(1):29-51.
    Hattanji T,Moriwaki H. 2009. Morphometric analysis of relic landslides using detailed landslide distribution maps:Implications for forecasting travel distance of future landslides[J]. Geomorphology,103(3):447-454.
    Heim. 1932. Landslides and human lives[M]. Vancouver:BiTech Publishers.
    McDougall S,Boultbee N,Hungr O. et al. 2006. The Zymoetz River landslide, British Columbia, Canada:description and dynamic analysis of a rock slide-debris flow[J]. Landslides,3(3):195-204.
    McDougall S. 2017. Landslide runout analysis-current practice and challenges[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,54(5):605-620.
    Qi S,Xu Q,Zhang B,et al. 2011. Source characteristics of long runout rock avalanches triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,40(4):896-906.
    Scheidegger A E. 1973. On the prediction of the reach and velocity of catastrophic landslides[J]. Rock Mechanics,5(4):231-236.
    Souisa M,Hendrajaya L,Handayani G. 2018. Study on estimates of travel distance, velocity and potential volume of amahusu sliding plane using energy conservation approach in conjunction with geoelectric survey[J]. Journal of Mathematical and Fundamental Sciences,50(2):166-181.
    Wen B P,Wang S J,Wang E Z,et al. 2004. Characteristics of rapid giant landslides in China[J]. Landslides,1(4):247-261.
    Whittall J R. 2016. Runout exceedance prediction for open pit slope failures[J]. Vancouver:University of British Columbia.
    白兰英,周杨,李绍红,等. 2018. 南江县古坟坪滑坡降雨入渗观测与稳定性分析[J]. 长江科学院院报,35(7):68-73.
    陈永波,乔建平,樊晓一,等. 2003. 四川省雅安市雨城区滑坡灾害成因调查[J]. 山地学报,21(5):638-638.
    樊晓一,黄润秋,乔建平,等. 2014. 未受河流阻止的滑坡水平运动距离与滑坡堵江判别[J]. 水文地质工程地质,41(1):128-133.
    樊晓一,乔建平,韩萌,等. 2012. 灾难性地震和降雨滑坡的体积与运动距离研究[J]. 岩土力学,33(10):3051-3058.
    樊晓一,乔建平. 2010. "坡"、"场"因素对大型滑坡运动特征的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,29(11):2337-2347.
    胡泽铭. 2013.

    四川红层地区缓倾角滑坡成因机理研究[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学.
    雷德鑫,易武. 2018. 三峡库区王家坡滑坡降雨阈值分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,29(5):95-101.
    冷晓玉. 2016.

    都江堰王溪村滑坡运动的作用[D]. 绵阳:西南科技大学.
    李超. 2014.

    降雨对滑坡稳定性的作用机理研究-陕南山区滑坡灾害研究[D]. 西安:西安工业大学.
    李军霞. 2011.

    西藏隆子县滑坡灾害形成机理及非线性预测研究[D]. 吉林:吉林大学.
    龙建辉. 2008.

    高速远程黄土滑坡预测预报方法研究[D]. 西安:长安大学.
    罗小杰,黄胜华. 2001. 滑坡活动强度与几何要素之关系探讨[J]. 水文地质工程地质,(5):10-14.
    孟华君,姜元俊,张树轩,等. 2017. 汶川地震前后都江堰山区滑坡滑动距离影响因素变化分析[J]. 地质力学学报,23(6):904-913.
    戚国庆. 2004.

    降雨诱发滑坡机理及其评价方法研究-非饱和土力学理论在降雨型滑坡研究中的应用[D]. 成都:成都理工大学.
    桑凯. 2013. 近60 a中国滑坡灾害数据统计与分析[J]. 科技传播,5(10):129-131.
    宋增辉. 2015.

    降雨对秦巴山区滑坡稳定性的影响——以镇安县某滑坡为例[C]//陕西省地质调查院. 秦巴山区地质灾害与防治学术研讨会论文集. 武汉:中国地质大学出版社.
    王一超,黎学锐. 2017. 南江县降雨诱发土质滑坡成因研究[J]. 人民珠江,38(2):49-52.
    魏昌利,张瑛,冯文凯,廖维. 2019. 岷江上游地质灾害发育强度与规律分析[J]. 工程地质学报,27(3):640-650.
    吴钟腾,叶龙珍,郑之望. 2016. 基于运动学原理的滑坡运动距离预测方法研究[J]. 工程地质学报,24 (S):673-680.
    吴钟腾. 2014.

    云南彝良麻窝滑坡失稳后的运动危险性预测研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学.
    徐勇,连志鹏,郭春迎. 2018. 降雨型滑坡定量风险评价研究——以宣恩县干坝滑坡为例[J]. 华南地质与矿产,34(4):302-309.
    杨啡. 2017.

    澜沧江上游根达坎巨型滑坡复活演化机理及堵江预测研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学.
    杨加庆,左琼华,朱婉明,等. 2013. 云南兰坪金顶凤翔村滑坡形成条件及治理[J]. 云南地质,32(1):84-87.
    杨文东. 2006.

    降雨型滑坡特征及其稳定分析研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学.
    殷坤龙,姜清辉,汪洋. 2002. 滑坡运动过程仿真分析[J]. 地球科学,27(5):632-636.
    詹威威,黄润秋,裴向军,等. 2017. 沟道型滑坡-碎屑流运动距离经验预测模型研究[J]. 工程地质学报,25(1):154-163.
    张乘千. 2014.

    延安市降雨与黄土滑坡相关性分析[D]. 西安:长安大学.
    曾元勇. 2014.

    降雨诱发震裂山体滑坡变形失稳机理研究——以安县大树湾滑坡为例[D]. 成都:成都理工大学.
    周葵,周俊,李果. 2017. 降雨作用下洛莫滑坡变形失稳机制分析[J]. 中国水运,17(11):206-208.
    周小兵. 2016. 降雨诱发雅泸高速K198-K199段堆积层滑坡变形破坏特征及稳定性研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学.
    佐佐恭二,郭百平,贾志军. 1988. 滑坡及崩塌运动的预测(上)——改进型滑板模型与模拟模型[J]. 中国水土保持,(6):28-31.
    佐佐恭二,郭百平,贾志军. 1988. 滑坡及崩塌运动的预测(下)——改进型滑板模型与模拟模型[J]. 中国水土保持,(7):42-49.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (909) PDF downloads(35) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

      Contacts Us

    • Sponsor: Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IECAS) ， China Radar Industry Association
    • Phone: 010－82998121，82998124

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  Support: info@rhhz.net   百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return