Citation: | Song Yupeng, Song Binghui, Sun Yonghu, et al. 2021. Application of seabed cone penetration test in calculation of bearing capacity of pile foundlaion ofoffshore platform[J]. Jourmal of Engineering Geology, 29(6): 1942-1948. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0004 |
An Y N, Yan X C, Yang K, et al. 2013. Some misconceptions in pile insertion analysis of offshore platforms in Shengli Chengdao Oilfield[J]. Journal of Waterway and Harbor, 34 (6): 537-541. http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000038061457410_0733.html
|
Bustamante M, Gianeselli L. 1982. Pile bearing capacity predictions by means of static penetrometer CPT[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing: 493-500.
|
Cai G J, Liu S Y, Tong L Y, et al. 2009. Soil classification using CPTU data based upon cluster analysis theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 31 (3): 416-424. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-YTGC200903025.htm
|
Chu L P, Sun Y F, Song Y P, et al. 2017. Application of seabed cone penetration test in research on the seafloor geotechnical engineering characteristics in the Yellow River estuary[J]. Coastal Engineering, 36 (1): 22-33. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HAGC201701003.htm
|
Dennis N D, Olson R E. 1983. Axial capacity of steel pipe piles in clay[C]//Proceedings of Conference on Geotechnical Practice in Offshore Engineering. Austin, Texas: ASCE: 370-388.
|
Geng G Q. 2016. Research on penetration mechanism of Piezocone Penetration Tset(CPTU) and its application on pile foundation engineering[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University.
|
Guo S Z, Liu R. 2015. Application of cone penetration test in offshore engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 37 (S1): 207-211. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2015S1040.htm
|
Han M, Li G, Ye J C, et al. 2020. Discussion of CPT derived undrained shear strength of cohesive soil in Chengdao Oilfield[J]. Soil Engineering and Foundation, 34 (4): 520-524.
|
Hu Y, Wang Y. 2020. Identification of subsurface soil stratification using cone penetration tests and Bayesian learning[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 28 (5): 966-972.
|
Jia Z L, Yan S W, Yang A W, et al. 2016. Application of cone penetration test for the analysis of pile-run of long and large diameter piles in offshore geotechnical engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 35 (S1): 3274-3282. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-YSLX2016S1077.htm
|
Kuiter J D, Beringen F L. 1979. Pile foundations for large North Sea structures[J]. Marine Geotechnology, 3 (3): 267-314. doi: 10.1080/10641197909379805
|
Li D Z, Tong S X. 1982. Discussion on reasonable depth of pile tip penetration into bearing stratum[J]. Architecture Technology, (6): 28-31.
|
Li S D, Sun Y M, Chen W C, et al. 2019. Analyses of gas production methods and offshore production tests of natural gas hydrates[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 27 (1): 55-68. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-GCDZ201901007.htm
|
Liu S Y, Cai G J, Zou H F. 2013. Practical soil classification methods in China based on piezocone penetration tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 35 (10): 1765-1776. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-YTGC201310002.htm
|
Randolph M F, Dolwin J B. 1994. Design of driven piles in sand[J]. Gotechnique, 44 (3): 427-448. doi: 10.1680/geot.1994.44.3.427
|
Randolph M F. 2003. Science and empiricism in pile foundation design[J]. Gotechnique, 53 (10): 847-875. doi: 10.1680/geot.2003.53.10.847
|
The Professional Standards Compilation Group of People′s Republic of China. 2017. Technical specification for piezocone penetration testing(T/CCES 1-2017)[S]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.
|
The National Standards Compilation Group of People′s Republic of China. 2009. Specifications for offshore platform engineering geology investigation(GB/T 17503-2009)[S]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.
|
Zhu J F. 2011. Study on properties of soil considering disturbance[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University.
|
Zou H F. 2018. Research on spatial variability and uncertainties within pile capacity of soft soils based on CPTU[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University.
|
安永宁, 阎锡臣, 杨鲲, 等. 2013. 胜利埕岛油田海上作业平台插桩分析中的几点误区思考[J]. 水道港口, 34 (6): 537-541. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8443.2013.06.013
|
蔡国军, 刘松玉, 童立元, 等. 2009. 基于聚类分析理论的CPTU土分类方法研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 31 (3): 416-424. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2009.03.018
|
楚立鹏, 孙永福, 宋玉鹏, 等. 2017. 海床式静力触探在黄河口海底土工程特性研究中的应用[J]. 海岸工程, 36 (1): 22-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HAGC201701003.htm
|
耿功巧. 2016. 孔压静力触探贯入机理及其桩基工程应用研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学.
|
郭绍曾, 刘润. 2015. 静力触探测试技术在海洋工程中的应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 37 (S1): 207-211. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2015S1040.htm
|
韩猛, 李国, 叶纪超, 等. 2020. 基于CPT确定埕岛油田黏性土不排水抗剪强度方法的探讨[J]. 土工基础, 34 (4): 520-524. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TGJC202004030.htm
|
胡越, 王宇. 2020. 静力触探识别场地土层分布的贝叶斯学习方法研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 28 (5): 966-972. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2020-263
|
贾沼霖, 闫澍旺, 杨爱武, 等. 2016. 静力触探在大直径超长桩溜桩分析中的应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 35 (S1): 3274-3282. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2016S1077.htm
|
李大展, 佟世祥. 1982. 关于桩尖贯入持力层合理深度问题的探讨[J]. 建筑技术, (6): 28-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJI198206005.htm
|
李守定, 孙一鸣, 陈卫昌, 等. 2019. 天然气水合物开采方法及海域试采分析[J]. 工程地质学报, 27 (1): 55-68. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2019-065
|
刘松玉, 蔡国军, 邹海峰. 2013. 基于CPTU的中国实用土分类方法研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 35 (10): 1765-1776. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201310002.htm
|
中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. 2009. 海上平台场址工程地质勘察规范(GB/T 17503-2009)[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社.
|
中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. 2017. 孔压静力触探测试技术规程(T/CCES 1-2017)[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社.
|
朱剑锋. 2011. 考虑扰动影响的土体性状研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学.
|
邹海峰. 2018. 基于CPTU的软弱土空间变异性特征与桩基承载力不确定性设计方法研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学.
|