SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SUBSEA TUNNELS CONSIDERING SEAWATER SEABED COUPLING EFFECT

CHEN Weiyun; LÜ Zhenyu; XU Lingyu; RUAN Bin; MA Jianjun; CHEN Guoxing

doi:10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0562

Volume 29 Issue 6

Dec. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY > 2021 > 29(6): 1878-1886

Chen Weiyun, Lü Zhenyu, Xu Lingyu, et al. 2021. Seismic response of subsea tunnels considering seawater seabe d coupling effect[J].Journal of Engineering Geology, 29(6): 1878-1886. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0562

Citation:

PDF( 6452 KB)

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SUBSEA TUNNELS CONSIDERING SEAWATER SEABED COUPLING EFFECT

doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0562

CHEN Weiyun^{①, ②
,},
LÜ Zhenyu^①,
XU Lingyu^{①
,
,},
RUAN Bin^③,
MA Jianjun^②,
CHEN Guoxing^①

①.
Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210009, China
②.
School of Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
③.
School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Funds:

Received Date: 2021-08-05
Rev Recd Date: 2021-11-17

Available Online: 2022-01-06

Publish Date: 2021-12-25

Abstract

Abstract

The potential threat of earthquake disaster should be considered in the construction of subsea tunnel in offshore areas. Considering the influence of seawater hydrodynamic pressure can be more in line with the actual situation when analyzing the seismic response of subsea tunnel. A seismic analysis model of water-seabed-tunnel is established, which takes into account the nonlinearity of soil and the fluid-structure interaction between seawater and seabed. The seismic response of undersea tunnel under different seismic excitations and water depths is studied. The results show that the acoustic module can simulate the fluid-structure interaction well. Under the action of horizontal earthquake, the stress of tunnel is mainly concentrated at the arch shoulder and arch foot. The maximum hydrodynamic pressure in the calculated area under earthquake action occurs on the left and right sides of the seabed above the tunnel. Under bidirectional seismic excitation, the hydrodynamic pressure on the seabed surface increases significantly, and the stress peak at each point of the tunnel also increases significantly. The seismic response of subsea tunnel under the earthquake with rich low frequency component is much stronger than that with rich high frequency component. Seismic damage of subsea tunnel decreases with the increasing water depth. The results are of some reference value for understanding the actual seismic response law of the undersea tunnel.
- Subsea tunnel,
- Fluid-solid interaction,
- Seismic response,
- Hydrodynamic pressure,
- Seismic damage

FullText(HTML)

References(46)

References

Chen G X, Lu Y J, Wang Y Z, et al. 2021.3D nonlinear seismic response characteristics for the junction of undersea shield tunnel-shaft[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 43 (8): 1382-1390.

Chen G X, Ruan B, Zhao K, et al. 2020. Nonlinear response characteristics of undersea shield tunnel subjected to strong earthquake motions[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 24 (3): 351-380. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2018.1453416

Chen G X, Sun R R, Zhao D F, et al. 2019. Longitudinal seismic response charateristics of seabed shield tunnels using submodeling analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 41 (11): 1983-1991.

Chen G X, Wang Y Z, Zhao D F, et al. 2021. A new effective stress method for nonlinear site response analyses[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 50 (6): 1595-1611. doi: 10.1002/eqe.3414

Chen X J, Jing L P, Cui J, et al. 2020. Shaking table model test study on seismic response of animmersed-tube tunnel[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 51 (4): 88-97.

Cheng X S, Li G L, Chen J, et al. 2018. Seismic response of a submarine tunnel under the action of a sea wave[J]. Marine Structures, 60 : 122-135. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.03.004

Cui J, Lu Y B, Qu J X, et al. 2020. Influencing factors analysis of seismic responses of water immersed tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 55 (6): 1224-1230.

Gao G Y, Geng J L, Bi J W, et al. 2019. Effect of subway induced environmental vibration on building site through in-situ measurement[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 27 (05): 1116-1121. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-GCDZ201905023.htm

Gong C Y, Chen G X, Zhu J, et al. 2018. Effect of constitutive model characteristics on nonlinear seismic response of deep site[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 38 (3): 448-457. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DZXK201803007.htm

Liu J B, Gu Y, Du Y X. 2006. Consist viscous-spring artificial boundaries and viscous-spring boundary elements[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 28 (9): 1070-1075. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/279574696_Consistent_viscous-spring_artificial_boundaries_and_viscous-spring_boundary_elements

Liu Y, Chen G X, Kong M Y. 2013. Seismic response of undersea tunnels to hydrodynamic and hydrostatic pressures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 35 (S2): 357-362. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2013S2062.htm

Miao Y, Yao E L, Ruan B, et al. 2018. Seismic response of shield tunnel subjected to spatially varying earthquake ground motions[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 77 : 216-226. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.04.006

Rawat A, Mittal V, Chakraborty T, et al. 2019. Earthquake induced sloshing and hydrodynamic pressures in rigid liquid storage tanks analyzed by coupled acoustic-structural and Euler-Lagrange methods[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 134 : 333-346. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2018.10.016

Shang Y J, Jiang Y, Zhao B, et al. 2021. Numerical simulation of deformation and failure of mixed ground with different depth in extensional basins[J/OL]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2021-07-20, https://doi.org/10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-230.

Shekari M R. 2021. A coupled numerical approach to simulate the effect of earthquake frequency content on seismic behavior of submarine tunnel[J]. Marine Structures, 75: 102848. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102848

Tang S H, Zhang X P, Liu H, et al. 2020. Research and prospect on engineering difficulties and key technologies for underwater shield tunnel in complex ground[J/OL]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2020-06-03, https://doi.org/10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2020-044.

The National Standards Compilation Group of People's Republic of China. 2011. Code for design of concrete structures(GB50010-2010)[S]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.

Wang J, Liu H B, Zou Y, et al. 2020. Response analysis of twin tunnels under horizontal and vertical earthquake loading[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 15 (4): 670-683.

Westergaard H M. 1933. Water pressures on dams during earthquakes[J]. Trans Asce, 98 (2): 418-432. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/287494171_Water_pressure_on_dams_during_earthquakes/download

Xu Q, Bai C Y, Li W Y, et al. 2020. Response analysis of deformation and internal force of underground utility tunnel crossing active ground fracture[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 29 (5): 1632-1639.

Yuan Y, Yu H T, Yan X, et al. 2016. Multi-point shaking table test simulation and analysis of a super-long immersed tunnel[J]. China Journal of Highway and Trasport, 29 (12): 157-165. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/316937072_Multi-point_shaking_table_test_simulation_and_analysis_of_a_super-long_immersed_tunnel

Zeinoddini M, Parke G A R, Sadrossadat S M. 2012. Free-spanning submarine pipeline response to severe ground excitations: water-pipeline interactions[J]. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 3 (4): 135-149. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000098

Zhang F, Ma J X, Nan Y. 2021. Parameters selection verification calculation of concrete plastic damage model[J]. China Concrete and Cement Products, (1): 7-11, 29.

Zhang R L, Lou M L, Yuan Y. 2014. Three-dimensional seismic response analysis of soil-undersea immersed tunnel system[J]. Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences), 41 (4): 25-32. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HNDX201404004.htm

Zhao D F, Ruan B, Chen G X, et al. 2017. Validation of modified irregular loading-unloading rules based on Davidenkov skeleton curve and its equivalent shear strain algorithm implemented in ABAQUS[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 39 (5): 888-895. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-YTGC201705018.htm

Zhu J Q. 1988. Coupled motion between sea water and sea bed-soil under earthquake action[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 8 (2): 37-43. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFD1988-DGGC198802004.htm

Zhu S N, Li W H, Vincent W Lee, et al. 2020. Seismic response of undersea lining tunnels under incident plane P waves[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 42 (8): 1418-1427.

陈国兴, 卢艺静, 王彦臻, 等. 2021. 海底盾构隧道-竖井连接部位三维非线性地震反应特性[J]. 岩土工程学报, 43 (8): 1382-1390.

陈国兴, 孙瑞瑞, 赵丁凤, 等. 2019. 海底盾构隧道纵向地震反应特征的子模型分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 41 (11): 1983-1991. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201911003.htm

程新俊, 景立平, 崔杰, 等. 2020. 沉管隧道振动台模型地震反应试验研究[J]. 水利水电技术, 51 (4): 88-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJWJ202004010.htm

崔杰, 陆耀波, 渠建新, 等. 2020. 水域沉管隧道地震响应的影响因素分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 55 (6): 1224-1230. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNJT202006012.htm

高广运, 耿建龙, 毕俊伟, 等. 2019. 地铁环境振动对建筑场地影响实测分析[J]. 工程地质学报, 27 (5): 1116-1121. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2019050

龚彩云, 陈国兴, 朱姣, 等. 2018. 本构模型特性对深厚场地非线性地震反应的影响[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 38 (3): 448-457. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXK201803007.htm

刘晶波, 谷音, 杜义欣. 2006. 一致黏弹性人工边界及黏弹性边界单元[J]. 岩土工程报, 28 (9): 1070-1075. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SFXB200905031.htm

刘勇, 陈国兴, 孔梦云. 2013. 静、动水压力条件下海底隧道地震反应特性分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 35 (S2): 357-362. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2013S2062.htm

尚彦军, 蒋毅, 赵斌, 等. 2021. 拉张盆地不同埋深复合地层中隧道围岩变形破坏数值模拟研究[J/OL]. 工程地质学报, 2021-07-20, https://doi.org/10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-230.

唐少辉, 张晓平, 刘浩, 等. 2021. 复杂地层水下盾构隧道工程难点及关键技术研究与展望[J]. 工程地质学报, 29(5): 1477-1487. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2020-044

王杰, 刘华北, 邹炎, 等. 2020. 水平及竖向地震共同作用下双线隧道的响应分析[J]. 震灾防御技术, 15 (4): 670-683. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZFY202004002.htm

徐强, 白超宇, 李文阳, 等. 2020. 地下综合管廊穿越活动地裂缝变形与内力的响应分析[J]. 工程地质学报29 (5): 1632-1639. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2020-384

袁勇, 禹海涛, 燕晓, 等. 2016. 超长沉管隧道多点振动台试验模拟与分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 29 (12): 157-165. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2016.12.020

张飞, 马建勋, 南燕. 2021. 混凝土塑性损伤模型参数的选取与验证计算[J]. 混凝土与水泥制品, (1): 7-11, 29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNTW202101002.htm

张如林, 楼梦麟, 袁勇. 2014. 土-海底沉管隧道体系三维地震响应分析[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 41 (4): 25-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNDX201404004.htm

赵丁凤, 阮滨, 陈国兴, 等. 2017. 基于Davidenkov骨架曲线模型的修正不规则加卸载准则与等效剪应变算法及其验证[J]. 岩土工程学报, 39 (5): 888-895. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201705018.htm

中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. 2011. 混凝土结构设计规范(GB50010-2010)[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社.

朱镜清. 1988. 地震作用下海水与海床土的耦合运动[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 8 (2): 37-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC198802004.htm

朱赛男, 李伟华, Lee V W, 等. 2020. 平面P波入射下海底衬砌隧道地震响应解析分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 42 (8): 1418-1427.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views